In reply: We thank Mountain for his comments. As he points out, it is only possible to infer cause and effect from observational data. The fact that referrals for D-dimer levels and computed tomography pulmonary angiography increased during the same period does not prove that one “drove” the other, although we believe this is a reasonable inference. Importantly, D-dimer testing was introduced as a “rule-out” test in low-risk patients, in an effort to reduce unnecessary referrals for venous thromboembolism imaging; but we found no evidence in our observational data that this had occurred.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States: evidence of overdiagnosis. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 831-837.
- 2. Burge AJ, Freeman KD, Klapper PJ, Haramati LB. Increased diagnosis of pulmonary embolism without a corresponding decline in mortality during the CT era. Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 381-386.
No relevant disclosures.