To the Editor: The recent article by Elshaug and colleagues identifying potentially low-value health care practices1 does not distinguish between surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in adults (which is largely used as an adjunctive or salvage intervention in Australia) and children (which is primarily a first-line intervention).
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
This letter is supported by the Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
No relevant disclosures.