To the Editor: A rural general practitioner’s workload is significantly larger than that of his or her urban colleagues, and this is attributable to work activities in rural public hospitals.1 A GP who provides after-hours on-call service to the community through the local hospital or emergency department is not only valued, but also more likely to be retained in the rural workforce.2 However, on-call commitments and the unrelenting nature of after-hours care can negatively affect professional and personal wellbeing, family life and opportunities to enjoy the rural location.3
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. McGrail MR, Humphreys JS, Joyce CM, et al. How do rural GPs’ workloads and work activities differ with community size compared with metropolitan practice? Aust J Prim Health 2012; 18: 228-233.
- 2. Russell DJ, McGrail MR, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J. What factors contribute most to the retention of general practitioners in rural and remote areas? Aust J Prim Health 2012; 18: 289-294.
- 3. Humphreys JS, Jones MP, Jones JA, Mara PR. Workforce retention in rural and remote Australia: determining the factors that influence length of practice. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 472-476.
- 4. Rural Doctors Association Australia. Viable models of rural and remote practice: stage 1 and stage 2 reports. Canberra: RDAA, 2003.
- 5. Adelstein BA, Piza MA, Nayyar V, et al. Rapid response systems: a prospective study of response times. J Crit Care 2011; 26: 635.e11-e18.
No relevant disclosures.