Ray Moynihan rings some notes of caution coming from experiences elsewhere
Change is perennial in health care, but some changes are more significant than others, like the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR) currently being rolled out across Australia. An ambitious reform, its much-touted benefits are safer and more effective care, less duplication of unnecessary tests — and, of course, enhanced datasets for researchers. As with most things medical, potential adverse consequences can attract less attention than promises, so it may be timely to explore a few experiences elsewhere.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- 1. Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, et al. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ 2010; 341: c5814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5814.
- 2. Greenhalgh T, Morris L, Wyatt J, Thomas G. Lessons learned from implementation of nationally shared electronic patient records in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In: Looking back, moving forward. Published and distributed with Health Serv J 2012; 15 Mar.
- 3. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology; Institute of Medicine. Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.
- 4. Ash J, Kilo C, Shapiro M, et al. Roadmap for provision of safer healthcare information systems: preventing e-iatrogenesis. Portland, Or: Oregon Health and Science University, 2011. http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2011/Health-IT/Commissioned-paper-Roadmap-for-Provision-of-Safer-HIS.pdf (accessed Aug 2012).
- 5. Coiera EW, Kidd MR, Haikerwal MC. A call for national e-health clinical safety governance. Med J Aust 2012; 196: 430-431. <MJA full text>
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.


No relevant disclosures.