The challenge of removing what’s useless, harmful or cost-ineffective
It’s easy to forget that the evidence-based approach to medicine is still relatively new, and that a substantial part of health care is not supported by gold-standard evaluation. New procedures, until very recently, have had no requirement for rigorous testing, unlike new drugs. Of the more than 5000 items on the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) today, most “have never been comprehensively assessed for their safety, effectiveness and/or cost-effectiveness”.1 But now many more interventions will be exposed to the chill winds of evaluation. And those that don’t shape up could become targets for “disinvestment” — withdrawal of funding from existing treatments.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Elshaug A. Health technology assessment and disinvestment in Australian Medicare. Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Health Economics; 2011 Jul 10-13; Toronto, Canada. International Health Economics Association, 2011. http://ihea2011.abstractsubmit.org/presentations/123/ (accessed Jan 2012).
- 2. Medical Benefits Reviews Task Group. Comprehensive management framework for the MBS. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2011. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/New_MBS_Items (accessed Jan 2012).
- 3. Medical Benefits Reviews Task Group. Colonoscopy review. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2011. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Colonoscopy_Review (accessed Jan 2012).
- 4. Merlin T, Street J, Holton C, et al. Review of MBS items for specific ophthalmology services under the MBS quality framework. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2011. http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/Content/Ophthalmology_Review (accessed Jan 2012) .
- 5. Medical Services Advisory Committee. Review of kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fracture and review of interim funded service: vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fracture. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2011. http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/Content/27.1-1 (accessed Jan 2012).
- 6. Wulff KC, Miller FG, Pearson SD. Can coverage be rescinded when negative trial results threaten a popular procedure? The ongoing saga of vertebroplasty. Health Aff 2011; 30: 2269-2276.
- 7. Larmour I, Pignataro S, Barned K, et al. A therapeutic equivalence program: evidence-based promotion of more efficient use of medicines. Med J Aust 2011; 194: 631-634. <MJA full text>
No relevant disclosures.