MJA
MJA

Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease in Australian children after introduction of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

Scott R Williams, Paul J Mernagh, Michael H T Lee and Jonathan T Tan
Med J Aust 2011; 194 (3): 116-120. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04192.x
Published online: 7 February 2011

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate trends in the incidence and serotype profile of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Australian children under 2 years of age after the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPCV).

Design and setting: Analysis of incidence rates calculated using IPD surveillance data (including age, Indigenous status and serotype of the pneumococcal isolate) from 2002 to 2007 obtained from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System and population estimates obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Main outcome measures: Trends in IPD incidence among Indigenous and non-Indigenous children between 2002 and 2007; change in the serotype profile of IPD in non-Indigenous children after the introduction of universal 7vPCV vaccination in 2005.

Results: Overall incidence of IPD decreased by 74% in all children < 2 years of age between 2002 and 2007 (P < 0.001). While the incidence of IPD caused by 7vPCV serotypes decreased significantly among both Indigenous and non-Indigenous children, the incidence of non-7vPCV serotype IPD increased significantly in non-Indigenous children (from 9.7 to 15.7 per 100 000, P < 0.001). Compared with a pre-vaccination period (2002–2004), the 2007 incidence of serotype 19A IPD in non-Indigenous children increased significantly (from 2.7 to 8.6 per 100 000, P < 0.001). In 2007, 19A was the predominant serotype causing IPD (37.7%) in all children aged < 2 years.

Conclusions: The overall incidence of IPD decreased from 2002 to 2007, primarily driven by a reduction in IPD caused by 7vPCV serotypes. However, this was partially offset by a significant increase in the incidence of IPD caused by non-7vPCV serotypes, particularly 19A, in non-Indigenous children.

Pneumococcal disease is estimated to cause over 800 000 child deaths a year worldwide.1 In areas with universal childhood vaccination programs using the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPCV), the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in young children has significantly decreased.2-4 In Australia, 7vPCV has been included in the childhood immunisation program for Indigenous children since mid 2001. This was subsequently expanded to include all Australian children in January 2005. The overall incidence of IPD in Australian children under the age of 2 years is reported to have declined by 75% between 2002 and 2006.5

7vPCV covers seven pneumococcal serotypes (4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F). Before its use, these seven serotypes accounted for 84% of IPD cases in Australian children younger than 5 years.6 While 7vPCV use has led to a decrease in the overall incidence of IPD, studies in the United States,2,7 Canada8 and Spain9,10 have reported the emergence of IPD caused by serotypes not covered by 7vPCV, particularly serotype 19A. In contrast, several other studies found no increase in IPD caused by non-vaccine serotypes in areas where routine 7vPCV vaccination is carried out.11-13

The emergence of serotype 19A is clinically important, as it is prevalent worldwide and has shown multidrug resistance.14,15 From 2001 to 2007, the incidence of IPD caused by serotype 19A among non-Indigenous children aged less than 5 years in Western Australia increased from 1.6 to 7.8 per 100 000.16 This increase was not observed among Indigenous children, and a study of Indigenous people in Queensland also found no evidence for an increase in IPD caused by serotype 19A.17 Notably, these two studies were confined to individual states of Australia. As such, a nationwide study may provide additional power to detect changes and trends in IPD and serotype distribution.

We evaluated the incidence of IPD in Australian children under 2 years of age from 2002 to 2007 to determine the dynamics of both 7vPCV and non-7vPCV serotype IPD, the effects of the widespread introduction of 7vPCV, and differences in the dynamics of serotype 19A in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children on a national level.

Methods
Results
Trends in IPD incidence

Between 2002 and 2007, there were 1871 IPD case notifications recorded by the NNDSS among all Australian children aged < 2 years (148 in Indigenous children, 1441 in non-Indigenous children, and 282 in children whose Indigenous status was unknown). Serotype was determined in 1629 cases (87%). As shown in Box 1, the incidence of IPD decreased by 74% between 2002 and 2007 (from 98.1 to 25.1 per 100 000, P < 0.001). The reduction in IPD incidence was more pronounced in non-Indigenous children (from 84.7 to 19.5 per 100 000, P < 0.001) than Indigenous children (from 129.1 to 82.3 per 100 000, P < 0.05).

IPD cases caused by 7vPCV serotypes decreased overall by 97%, accounting for 9% of IPD cases in 2007 compared with 71% of cases in 2002. Box 2 compares the change in incidence of IPD caused by 7vPCV and non-7vPCV serotypes in Indigenous and non-Indigenous children aged < 2 years from 2002 to 2007. The incidence of IPD caused by 7vPCV serotypes decreased significantly among both Indigenous children (from 53.2 to 3.7 per 100 000, P < 0.001) and non-Indigenous children (from 63.4 to 2.1 per 100 000, P < 0.001). The incidence of IPD caused by non-7vPCV serotypes did not change significantly among Indigenous children (P = 0.60). In contrast, the incidence of non-7vPCV serotype IPD among non-Indigenous children increased significantly (from 9.7 to 15.7 per 100 000, P < 0.001).

The incidence of IPD caused by 7vPCV serotypes in 2007 was comparable between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children (3.7 v 2.1 per 100 000, P = 0.56). However, the incidence of IPD caused by non-7vPCV serotypes remained significantly higher among Indigenous children compared with non-Indigenous children (78.6 v 15.7 per 100 000, P < 0.001).

Incidence of IPD in non-Indigenous children before and after 7vPCV

Box 3 shows the change in IPD incidence among non-Indigenous children aged < 2 years after the introduction of the universal childhood 7vPCV immunisation program in 2005. Compared with the mean incidence of IPD between 2002 and 2004 (77.7 per 100 000), the overall incidence decreased by 75% in 2006 and 2007 (to 19.6 and 19.5 per 100 000, respectively, P < 0.001). The incidence of IPD caused by 7vPCV serotypes decreased by 91% in 2006 (5.3 per 100 000, P < 0.001) and 97% in 2007 (2.1 per 100 000, P < 0.001), compared with 2002–2004 (60.9 per 100 000).

Among the non-7vPCV serotypes, the incidence of IPD caused by serotype 19A showed a significant increase of 110% in 2006 (5.7 per 100 000, P < 0.01) and 215% in 2007 (8.6 per 100 000, P < 0.001), compared with 2002–2004 (2.7 per 100 000), to become the largest cause of IPD. There were also significant increases in 2007 in the incidence of cases caused by serotypes 11A (from 0.1 to 1.2 per 100 000, P < 0.05) and 22F (from 0.3 to 1.3 per 100 000, P < 0.05). Although there were some changes in the incidence of IPD caused by serotypes 6A and 3 in 2006, these marginally significant differences were not maintained in 2007.

IPD caused by serotypes covered in pneumococcal conjugate vaccines

Box 4 shows the cumulative proportion of IPD cases in 2007 in all Australian children aged < 2 years caused by serotypes covered by 7vPCV, as well as additional serotypes included in the 10-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (10vPCV and 13vPCV). These included serotypes 1, 5 and 7F (covered by both 10vPCV and 13vPCV) and serotypes 3, 6A and 19A (covered by 13vPCV only). Compared with 7vPCV, the six additional serotypes covered in 13vPCV accounted for an additional 50% of the IPD cases. Serotype 19A caused the highest proportion of IPD cases in 2007 (37.7%).

Serotype 19A

The change in incidence of IPD caused by serotype 19A in children aged < 2 years between 2002 and 2007 is illustrated in Box 5. There was no significant increase in the incidence of IPD caused by serotype 19A among Indigenous children (P = 0.71). In contrast, the incidence of serotype 19A IPD showed a significant increase among non-Indigenous children (P < 0.001).

Discussion

Since the inclusion of 7vPCV in the National Immunisation Program in Australia, the incidence of IPD has declined dramatically. Between 2002 and 2007, the incidence of IPD decreased by 74% among all Australian children under the age of 2 years. The decline was observed to occur later among non-Indigenous children (2005 onwards) than Indigenous children (2002 onwards), reflecting the earlier introduction of 7vPCV vaccination for Indigenous children compared with non-Indigenous children (mid 2001 v 2005). This decrease in IPD incidence was predominantly driven by a large reduction in IPD cases caused by 7vPCV serotypes.

Several studies have shown an increase in IPD caused by non-7vPCV serotypes following the introduction of 7vPCV vaccination.7,9,10,15 Similarly, in our study, the overall decrease in the incidence of IPD was partly offset by a significant increase in the incidence of IPD caused by non-7vPCV serotypes in non-Indigenous children. Serotype-level analyses showed that this increase was largely attributable to an increase in serotype 19A. An increase in serotype 19A has been previously reported in other countries, such as the US, Canada and Spain. This is of particular concern, as serotype 19A has been found to exhibit multidrug resistance14,15,20,21 and may exhibit greater potential for invasiveness.22 We found that serotype 19A accounted for 38% of IPD cases among Australian children under the age of 2 years in 2007. As such, the inclusion of serotype 19A in a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for children would provide significantly increased coverage for IPD in the National Immunisation Program.

In contrast, no significant increase in serotype 19A or non-7vPCV serotypes as a group was observed among Indigenous children. In spite of this, the incidence of non-7vPCV serotype IPD remained significantly higher in this group than in non-Indigenous children. The reasons for this difference are likely to be multifactorial. A North American study that examined risk factors for IPD in children found that ethnicity was not an independent risk factor when other factors such as underlying diseases and lack of breastfeeding were taken into account.23 This suggests that differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children may be a result of differential rates of independent risk factors. It is also important to note that the smaller population of Indigenous children in our study and smaller absolute number of cases among them render the data more susceptible to random fluctuations and may have reduced statistical power to detect trends. Nonetheless, the use of a conjugate vaccine with a broader range of serotypes, together with efforts to reduce modifiable risk factors, may be particularly beneficial for Indigenous children.

While some studies have suggested that the increase in serotype 19A may be a result of serotype replacement after the introduction of 7vPCV,7,10 a study in South Korea reported that serotype 19A increased even before the introduction of 7vPCV, and showed that the expansion of a multidrug-resistant clone (ST320) was responsible for the increase.24 Others have suggested that the emergence of serotype 19A in various populations is likely due to multiple factors, including the baseline prevalences of 19A and particular virulent clones, antibiotic use patterns, and frequency of pneumococcal transmission.25,26

The incidence of several other serotypes also showed an apparent change in non-Indigenous children after the introduction of 7vPCV vaccination. A decrease in IPD incidence caused by serotype 6A that was observed in 2006 compared with the pre-vaccination period may be a result of limited cross-protection afforded by serotype 6B in 7vPCV, as this has been shown to be cross-reactive with serotype 6A.27 However, this decrease was not sustained in 2007. The extent of cross-protection for serotype 6A provided by a three-dose schedule, as used in Australia (3+0), is not well studied, and identifying the contribution of the recently identified serotype 6C to these data would also be important. Serotypes 11A and 22F showed an apparent significant increase in 2007; however, owing to the small number of cases (< 10), and taking into account the multiple comparisons performed in this study, we are cautious about interpreting these results. Interestingly, no significant change in the incidence of IPD caused by serotypes 1 and 5, known to be responsible for epidemic outbreaks of IPD,28 was observed. In fact, there was a single case of serotype 1 IPD and no cases of serotype 5 IPD reported during the study period. Overall, these results highlight the importance of monitoring future trends at the serotype level.

A limitation of our study is the lack of data on the vaccination status of children with IPD, which means no observations on vaccine failure can be made. Another caveat is the lack of information on independent risk factors for IPD. Inclusion of such information would provide a clearer indication of the differences, if any, between Indigenous and non-Indigenous children. Nonetheless, such factors are unlikely to have changed drastically over the relatively short study period, and the trends observed within each group should remain valid.

While there is evidence of the emergence of non-7vPCV serotypes, particularly 19A, the effect of 7vPCV in reducing IPD incidence among both Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in Australia remains significant. The addition of serotype 19A to conjugate vaccines that cover a wider range of serotypes would further improve the impact of the immunisation program in reducing the incidence of IPD.

3 Change in invasive pneumococcal disease incidence in non-Indigenous children < 2 years of age after the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPCV) immunisation program in 2005*

Before 7vPCV program


After 7vPCV program


2002–2004


2006


2007


No. of cases

Mean cases/year

Mean incidence
(per 100 000)

No. of cases

Incidence
(per 100 000)

Change from
2002–2004

No. of cases

Incidence
(per 100 000)

Change from
2002–2004


7vPCV serotypes

4

56

18.7

3.9

3

0.6

84.9%

1

0.2

95.1%

6B

160

53.3

11.2

4

0.8

93.0%

2

0.4

96.6%

9V

43

14.3

3.0

0

0

na

1

0.2

93.7%

14

380

126.7

26.7

3

0.6

97.8%

1

0.2

99.3%

18C

54

18.0

3.8

6

1.2

68.7%§

1

0.2

94.9%

19F

122

40.7

8.6

7

1.4

83.8%

4

0.8

91.1%

23F

53

17.7

3.7

4

0.8

78.7%

1

0.2

94.9%

Subtotal

868

289.3

60.9

27

5.3

91.2%

11

2.1

96.5%


Non-7vPCV serotypes

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0.2

na

5

0

0

0

0

0

na

0

0

na

7F

6

2.0

0.4

3

0.6

40.9%

1

0.2

54.5%

3

8

2.7

0.6

8

1.6

182%

1

0.2

65.9%

6A

30

10.0

2.1

3

0.6

71.8%

6

1.1

45.4%

19A

39

13.0

2.7

29

5.7

110%§

45

8.6

215%

11A

2

0.7

0.1

0

0

na

6

1.2

819%

22F

4

1.3

0.3

2

0.4

141%

7

1.3

478%

33F

3

1.0

0.2

0

0

na

3

0.6

273%

Others**

28

9.3

2.0

16

3.2

161%

12

2.3

117%

Subtotal

120

40.0

8.4

61

12.1

143%

82

15.7

186%


Untyped

119

39.7

8.4

11

2.2

74.0%

9

1.7

79.4%


Total

1107

369.0

77.7

99

19.6

74.8%

102

19.5

74.9%


na = not applicable. * Cases during the first year of the 7vPCV immunisation program (2005) were excluded from analyses to allow time for vaccine uptake. Significance testing performed using the Fisher exact test, to compare the change in incidence between baseline (2002–2004) and 2006 and 2007. P < 0.001. § P < 0.01. P < 0.05. ** “Others” group includes serotypes 7C, 8, 10A, 12F, 15B, 15C, 17F, 18A, 23A, 24F, 35F and 35B. Untyped group comprises cases where the isolates were not serotyped.

Received 23 June 2010, accepted 24 October 2010

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.