To the Editor: Point prevalence studies have been used for many years as markers of antimicrobial consumption,1,2 but they have suffered from a lack of standardisation with regard to the populations studied and the data collected. These deficiencies make it difficult to generalise the data outside the study populations. In recent years, the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) has sought to overcome these weaknesses by implementing a web-based point prevalence survey in 20 European countries using standardised definitions for site of infection, indication and quality indicators, such as whether the indication for prescription is documented in the case notes.3 As Australian studies of this type have not been published, we undertook a pilot study to assess whether this point prevalence tool is feasible and useful in an Australian setting.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
- 1. Cooke DM, Salter AJ, Phillips I. The impact of antibiotic policy on prescribing in a London teaching hospital: a one-day prevalence survey as an indicator of antibiotic use. J Antimicrob Chemother 1983; 11: 447-453.
- 2. Ang L, Laskar R, Gray JW. A point prevalence study of infection and antimicrobial use at a UK children’s hospital. J Hosp Infect 2008; 68: 372-374.
- 3. Ansari F, Erntell M, Goossens H, Davey P. The European surveillance of antimicrobial consumption (ESAC) point-prevalence survey of antibacterial use in 20 European hospitals in 2006. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49: 1496-1504.
- 4. Kieran J, O’Doherty R, Hudson BJ. Use of an antibiotic point prevalence study to assess appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing and to identify targets for antimicrobial stewardship intervention. In: Abstract handbook. Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Annual Scientific Meeting; 2010 May 26–29; Darwin, NT. Poster abstract 68: 11.