To the Editor: I agree with the claim by Richardson that “the overlap between [primary care and emergency department (ED)] services is not as important as many have claimed” and that “‘primary care patients’ and ‘ED [Australasian Triage Scale] category 4 and 5’ patients are not interchangeable”.1 A review of the literature — especially from New Zealand — would show there are considerable differences between patients who attend the two types of services.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, ACT.
- 1. Richardson DB. Primary care services and emergency medicine [editorial]. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 429-430. <MJA full text>
- 2. Kljakovic M, Dalziel S. Out-of-hours attendance and outcomes for asthmatic patients at two primary care services. N Z Med J 1996; 109: 254-257.
- 3. Gribben B. General practitioners’ assessments of the primary care caseload in Middlemore Hospital Emergency Department. N Z Med J 2003; 116: U329.
- 4. Baker MG, Kljakovic M. The effect of emergency department policy change on Hutt district general practices. N Z Med J 1992; 105: 380-383.
- 5. Kljakovic M, Allan BC, Reinken J. Why skip the general practitioner and go to the accident and emergency department? N Z Med J 1981; 94: 49-52.