Connect
MJA
MJA

Planned home birth in Australia: politics or science?

Andrew F Pesce
Med J Aust 2010; 192 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03416.x
Published online: 18 January 2010

Robust evidence, rather than political pressure, should inform decisions about maternity care

The status of home birth in Australia has become more contentious than ever with the introduction of legislation which requires that all services provided by registered health professionals be covered by appropriate indemnity insurance. Although never intended to prevent registered midwives from providing care in planned home births, the absence of insurance for home birth has meant that any midwife assisting in a planned home birth appeared to have to forgo midwife registration, or risk penalty.


  • Sydney West Area Health Service, Sydney, NSW.



Competing interests:

I am President of the Australian Medical Association, which is opposed to home birth in Australia.

  • 1. Improving maternity services in Australia — the report of the Maternity Services Review. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009.
  • 2. Crotty M, Ramsay AT, Smart R, Chan A. Planned homebirths in South Australia 1976–1987. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 664-671.
  • 3. Bastian H, Keirse MJNC, Lancaster PA. Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ 1998; 317: 384-388.
  • 4. Department of Health, Government of Western Australia. 12th report of the Perinatal and Infant Mortality Committee of Western Australia, deaths 2002–04. Perth: Department of Health, 2007.
  • 5. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Bower C, et al. A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981–1987. Midwifery 1994; 10: 125-135.
  • 6. Kennare RM, Keirse MJNC, Tucker GR, Chan AC. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991–2006: differences in outcomes. Med J Aust 2010; 192: 76-80. <eMJA full text>
  • 7. de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli ACJ, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529 688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009; 116: 1177-1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02175.x.
  • 8. Johnson KC, Daviss BA. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ 2005; 330: 1416-1422.
  • 9. Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, et al. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ 2009; 181: 377-383. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.