The case that established the lawfulness of terminating pregnancy to preserve women’s health
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. A charge of illegal abortion – Rex v. Bourne. Lancet 1938; 232: 220-226.
- 2. Keown J. Abortion, doctors and the law. Some aspects of the legal regulation of abortion in England from 1803 to 1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- 3. Brookes B. Abortion in England 1900–1967. London: Routledge Kegan and Paul, 1988.
- 4. Bourne AW. Rex v. Bourne [letter]. Lancet 1938; 232: 280.
- 5. Aleck W Bourne [obituary]. BMJ 1975; 1: 99.
- 6. Rex v. Bourne [editorial]. Lancet 1938; 232: 201-202.
- 7. Talbot F. Abortion and the law [letter]. Lancet 1938; 232: 280-281.
- 8. R v. Davidson, (1969) Victorian Reports 667, Menhennitt J at 671.
- 9. R v. Bayliss and Cullen, (1986). 9 Qld Lawyer Reps 8 (Dist Ct) McGuire J at 45-56.
- 10. Vera Drake [film]. Leigh M, director. Les Films Alain Sarde, 2004.
- 11. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The care of women requesting induced abortion. National evidence-based clinical guidelines. London: RCOG, 2004.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.
None identified.