To the Editor: Arnold is correct to question whether the New South Wales reportable misconduct legislation will be effective,1 because it relies on doctors making a judgement about whether a colleague has flagrantly departed from accepted standards of professional practice. Doctors have a high threshold for referring to medical boards, in part because they perceive the system to be adversarial rather than recognising that individual and system factors can combine to create poor professional performance. Also, medical boards have no direct ability to modify the workplace circumstances to make them more supportive of a poorly performing doctor.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health, Flinders and Deakin Universities, Warrnambool, VIC.
- 1. Arnold PC. Mandatory reporting of professional incompetence [editorial]. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 132-133. <MJA full text>
- 2. Leape LL, Fromson JA. Problem doctors: is there a system-level solution? Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 107-115.
- 3. National Clinical Assessment Service. Analysis of the first four years of referral data. http://www.ncas.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/publications/key-publications/ (accessed Dec 2008).
- 4. Dunbar JA, Reddy P, Beresford B, et al. In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 80-83. <MJA full text>
- 5. Queensland Health. Safe doctors: fair system. http:// www.health.qld.gov.au/patientsafety/documents/safdocsguide.pdf (accessed Aug 2008).