Reintroducing the alcopops tax is important, but more comprehensive reform of alcohol taxation and other broader measures are needed
To those Australians who believe that alcohol consumption in this country is causing too much damage, and that a public health-focused, evidence-based alcohol policy can make a difference, the defeat of the “alcopops” legislation in the Senate in March this year was a disappointment. However, this is no reason to stop national action to reduce damage from alcohol. The thousands of Australians whose lives are damaged by alcohol, and the hundreds each year whose deaths could be prevented, are too important.1 Concerned organisations need to collaborate and advocate for a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to reducing the alcohol toll. Their ultimate goal should be to move to a more moderate and responsible drinking culture in Australia.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Collins DJ, Lapsley HM. The costs of tobacco, alcohol and illicit drug abuse to Australian society in 2004/05. Monograph Series No. 64. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2008.
- 2. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. Alcohol: no ordinary commodity — research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
- 3. Loxley W, Tombourou JW, Stockwell T, et al. The prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia: a review of the evidence. Perth: National Drug Research Institute and Centre for Adolescent Health, 2004.
- 4. National Preventative Health Taskforce Alcohol Working Group. Preventing alcohol-related harm in Australia: a window of opportunity. Technical Report No 3. Canberra: Preventative Health Taskforce, 2008.
- 5. Chikritzhs T, Dietze PM, Allsop SJ, et al. The “alcopops” tax: heading in the right direction [editorial]. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 294-295. <MJA full text>
- 6. Collins DJ, Lapsley HM. The avoidable costs of alcohol abuse in Australia and the potential benefits of effective policies to reduce the social costs of alcohol. National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 70. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2008.
- 7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2007 National Drug Strategy Household Survey: first results. (Drug Statistics Series No. 20. AIHW Cat. No. PHE 98.) Canberra: AIHW, 2008.
- 8. National Drug Research Institute. Restrictions on the sale and supply of alcohol: evidence and outcomes. Perth: National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, 2007.
- 9. Australian Medical Association. New chance for alcopop tax [media release]? 31 March 2009. Canberra: AMA, 2009. http://www.ama.com.au/node/4534 (accessed May 2009).
- 10. Ministerial Council on Drug Strategy. National Alcohol Strategy 2006–2009. Towards safer drinking cultures. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2006.
The Royal Australasian College of Physicians Alcohol Advisory Group is indebted to Mike Daube (Public Health Association of Australia, Perth), Geoff Munro (Australian Drug Foundation, Melbourne) and Tanya Chikritzhs (National Drug Research Institute, Perth) for their helpful comments on drafts of this editorial.
* Contributing members of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians Alcohol Advisory Group
Paul S Haber (University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW)
Alex D Wodak (St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW)
Bruce K Armstrong (University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW)
Katherine M Conigrave (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW)
George L Rubin (Australasian Faculty of Public Health Medicine, Sydney, NSW)
Nick M Walsh (Monash University, Melbourne, Vic)
Jenny Proimos (Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Vic)
Nicholas Lintzeris (University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW)
Geoffrey L Metz (Royal Australasian College of Physicians, Sydney, NSW)