To the Editor: This letter of lament was prompted by a recently overheard complaint by a first-year intern to her colleagues that radiologists were not “obeying” her! Her comment led us to review her last five imaging requests (“orders”). After discussion with other radiologists, three of these requests were considered inappropriate.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA.
- 2 SKG Radiology, Perth, WA.
Correspondence: turab.chakera@health.wa.gov.au
- 1. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic x-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004; 363: 345-351.
- 2. Thomson JEM, Tingey DRC. Radiation doses from computed tomography in Australia. Report ARL/TR123. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Australian Radiation Laboratory, 1997.
- 3. Bairstow PJ, Mendelson R, Dhillon R, Valton F. Diagnostic imaging pathways: development, dissemination, implementation, and evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care 2006; 18: 51-57.
- 4. Nuttall JL. Professional discretion, courtesy and plain good manners: an anecdotal and personal view. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 627-628. <MJA full text>
- 5. Government of Western Australia Department of Health. Diagnostic imaging pathways. http://www.imagingpathways.health.wa.gov.au (accessed Nov 2008).
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.