Many artificial and natural disasters result in threats to public health beyond those caused by the event itself. Threats posed by communicable diseases and the post-disaster physical environment are often overshadowed by the more visible acute response by ambulance and clinical services. Planning for and responding to these threats require the expertise of public health professionals, but it is only fairly recently that they have been involved in emergency response planning.
World Youth Day (WYD) 2008 was a mass gathering of Catholic youth held over several days in July 2008 in Sydney. Festivities commenced with gatherings across Australia during a cultural exchange event called Days in the Diocese. Following this, young people from around the world converged on Sydney. About 100 000 individuals stayed in simple accommodation, such as school halls, around the greater Sydney metropolitan area. At the end of the week, an outdoor Evening Vigil with over 200 000 participants preceded the Final Mass, which was attended by about 400 000 people.1
NSW public health service workers drew on their own experience, gained from preparing for other mass gatherings, and on the experience of public health services of other countries that had hosted WYD events,2,3 to consider risks to the health of participants and the community during WYD 2008. Key risks identified were communicable disease outbreaks (due to endemic local diseases such as influenza, and the possibility of imported diseases not seen in Australia) and environmental health issues (particularly considering the temporary and basic nature of much of the mass accommodation). The need for pre- and intra-event health promotion messages was identified, including ensuring that participants were aware the event was taking place in the southern hemisphere winter, unlike previous WYDs (which took place in the northern hemisphere summer).
The command, control and coordination structures replicated those in the NSW Health disaster plan, Healthplan.4 A Public Health Emergency Operations Centre (PHEOC) was established, with links to the Health Services Disaster Control Centre (HSDCC; which coordinated the whole-of-health response and liaised with event organisers and other emergency response agencies) via a public health liaison officer at the HSDCC. Protocols and procedures for the PHEOC accorded with the Australasian Inter-service Incident Management System (AIIMS).5
Good disease surveillance was vital for detecting health problems among the participants and the community, and responding to them. Existing public health surveillance systems, such as routine communicable disease surveillance and surveillance of emergency department discharge diagnoses, were enhanced, and new systems established, including surveillance of attendance at venue-specific, onsite medical units, and of calls to a health advice line by pilgrim team leaders. Communicable diseases experts from other states and territories and the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing participated in daily public teleconferences to consider Australia-wide communicable disease threats.

NetEpi,6 an Internet-based public health outbreak management software program, was used to monitor presentations of conditions of interest across the onsite medical units, and by NSW public health units in the field. A password-protected interactive website (“wiki”) was established to post updated protocols and documents in the planning and response phases, and to provide situation reports to the public health community. A fleet of laptop computers with multiple modes of Internet connectivity were purchased to provide flexible online response capacity across field sites.
Careful workforce planning was required to allow public health personnel to continue to carry out their core business while assisting with WYD activities. During WYD, the PHEOC was operational every day for 16 hours a day, resulting in a need for extra security and staff transport requirements.
Extra surveillance staff were sourced from the NSW Public Health Officer Training Program and from the Masters of Applied Epidemiology program at the Australian National University. Environmental health officers (EHOs) were recruited from public health units across NSW, and staff from public health laboratories were requested to increase their alert level.
Laboratory planning included provision of couriers for pathology specimens from onsite medical units, and use of dedicated WYD request forms to ensure that high-priority specimens were processed effectively and that results were rapidly communicated to operations personnel, and to track costs.
Robust communication systems between field staff, and between PHEOC and field staff, were recognised as a priority — both for information flow and for the safety of staff. Mobile phones were issued to field staff, and email accounts and remote network access were arranged for particular position holders. Radios were also provided (as it was expected the mobile phone network might not cope with the surge in use during the Final Mass), and training in their use was provided.
In the days before WYD, daily teleconferences with staff responding to public health incidents among pilgrims during Days in the Diocese enabled consideration of potential public health response challenges during the main event. These included problems communicating with participants (who were occupied with organised events for most of the day) and event organisers (who were busy with events), and problems with gaining information about destinations (within Sydney) of participants who were identified as unwell.
As anticipated, communicable disease among the pilgrims was the major public health issue during WYD, with over 30 clusters of cases (“outbreaks”) of influenza (arising from five simultaneously circulating viruses), three outbreaks of gastroenteritis, and a single case of varicella infection.

At the commencement of the main WYD activities, field EHOs reported witnessing a large number of trips and falls related to cable protection systems at event venues. This hazard correlated with presentations of injuries from falls to first aid posts and to onsite medical units. Communications to the organisers led to implementation of risk-reduction measures, such as painting the hazards red and enlisting volunteers to hold up warning signage.
Cold weather at the commencement of the week led to a review and enhancement of plans for responding to multiple presentations of people with hypothermia during the mass sleep-out event preceding the Final Mass. Public health services liaised with medical services in the development of plans that included triggers for response (for example, calling in volunteers to staff a mass re-warming facility), review of treatment protocols, stockpiling warm clothes, and discharge planning. Fortunately, by the time of the mass sleep-out the weather had improved, and few cases of hypothermia were recorded.
WYD was a unique mass-gathering event for Australia, with characteristics that posed particular challenges for public health. Although it was a planned event, and one that is unlikely to be experienced again in NSW for some time, lessons from WYD are being incorporated into public health emergency management planning in this state. This includes a reinforcement of understanding the importance of public health being part of the event-planning process for mass gatherings, maintaining readiness for mobile team deployment, further development of information management systems (including interactive websites), considering future training requirements, and methods for increasing public health surge capacity in emergencies.

The need to ensure maintenance of normal public health core services during a time of high demand was also emphasised. During the WYD response, public health unit resources were stretched because of the need to continue to respond to other public health concerns, including outbreaks of infectious disease in nursing homes, cases of meningococcal disease, and environmental health concerns.
Public health emergency planners and practitioners have a key role in both mass gatherings and emergency response. Planned mass-gathering events are an ideal time to test preparedness and response and to build relationships with clinical emergency response personnel, as well as personnel from other response agencies. The planning and response for WYD 2008 has increased public health response capacity, allowed better understanding of some of the challenges that will occur with other emergency responses, and promoted the refinement of plans — blessings in disguise.

Abstract