In reply: Ernst is concerned about the sham acupuncture procedure used in our trial.1 Although not universally agreed, the sham/placebo control we adopted has been described as best practice.2,3 The assumption that, without de-qi, participants would not be blinded is not supported by the literature. In fact, a sham procedure without de-qi was used in a recent trial reported by Ernst and colleagues on acupuncture for subacute stroke rehabilitation.4 In that study, as in ours, to increase the credibility of blinding, participants with previous experience of acupuncture were excluded, and those assessing the outcomes of treatment were blinded.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 Division of Chinese Medicine, School of Health Sciences, World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC.
- 2 School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC.
- 1. Xue CCL, An X, Cheung TP, et al. Acupuncture for persistent allergic rhinitis: a randomised, sham-controlled trial. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 337-341. <MJA full text>
- 2. Dincer F, Linde K. Sham interventions in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture — a review. Complement Ther Med 2003; 11: 235-242.
- 3. Witt C, Brinkhaus B, Jena S, et al. Acupuncture in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 136-143.
- 4. Park J, White AR, James MA, et al. Acupuncture for subacute stroke rehabilitation: a sham-controlled, subject- and assessor-blind randomised trial. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 2026-2031.
- 5. Ernst E, Pittler MH, Wider B, Boddy K. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Mosby, 2006.