MJA
MJA

Barrett’s oesophagus and columnar metaplasia: saying what we mean

Norman J Carr
Med J Aust 2007; 187 (9): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01394.x
Published online: 5 November 2007

Straightforward, unambiguous terminology can reduce the risk of labelling patients inappropriately

Whenever the definition of a diagnostic term is changed, a Pandora’s box of potential confusion is opened. Are all clinicians and research investigators using the same criteria? If a patient has been given a diagnostic label, does it refer to the old or the new definition? Barrett’s oesophagus has changed its definition more than once over the past five decades and is a prime example of how changing definitions causes confusion for clinicians and investigators alike.1,2 A solution to this problem lies in avoiding the potentially confusing term “Barrett’s oesophagus” altogether. Moreover, this is possible by using existing terminology without the need for any new definitions.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.