Riding on the tail of the coauthorship explosion
Once upon a time, well-bred scientists sucked on the end of a quill and produced magnum opuses with single-author bylines, such as Charles Darwin’s The origin of species. Following the model of other creative domains (eg, Rodgers and Hammerstein for musicals, Gilbert and Sullivan for operettas, and Galton and Simpson for television series), scientists moved to byline couplings (eg, the double-helix twist of Crick and Watson).
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
My sincere thanks to the “et al” team of Heather Brotchie, Kerrie Eyers and Matthew Hyett for manuscript assistance.
The chance of being awarded a competitive research grant is increasingly tied to “performance criteria”, with publication counts often a key focus. To reduce my performance anxiety, I am changing my name to “et al” and propose to copyright myself when I write copy. I recognise, however, that no man is an island and that there is a need for generativity — if not al-truism. So, if you feel a need for coauthors to add gravitas to your projected publication, I (et al) could be your man. As the Paul Simon song goes, “You can call me Al”.