Unnecessary examinations expose patients to risk without benefit and are a threat to the effective allocation of resources
Things aren’t as they used to be. Imaging investigations are replacing the old paradigm of history-taking, physical examination and provisional clinical diagnosis.1 We may blame intellectual laziness, but short consultation times in general practice, fear of litigation, and the expectations of patients all contribute to the burgeoning use of medical imaging. Unfortunately, a lack of understanding of the role of imaging in specific clinical situations leads to unnecessary imaging or imaging that is inappropriate in terms of timing or the choice of modality.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Schattner A. Clinical paradigms revisited Med J Aust 2006; 185: 273-275. <MJA full text>
- 2. Simpson G, Hartrick GS. Use of thoracic computed tomography by general practitioners. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 43-46. <eMJA full text>
- 3. Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ 2004; 328: 578-580.
- 4. Hammett RJ, Harris RD. Halting the growth in diagnostic testing. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 124-125. <MJA full text>
- 5. Glaves J. The use of radiological guidelines to achieve a sustained reduction in the number of radiographic examinations of the cervical spine, lumbar spine and knees performed for GPs. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 914-920.
- 6. Matowe L, Ramsay CR, Grimshaw JM, et al. Effects of mailed dissemination of the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines on general practitioner referrals for radiography: a time series analysis. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 575-578.
- 7. Bairstow PJ, Mendelson R, Dhillon R, Valton F. Diagnostic imaging pathways: development, dissemination, implementation, and evaluation. Int J Qual Health Care 2006; 18: 51-57.
- 8. Teunen D. The European Directive on health protection of individuals against the dangers of ionising radiation in relation to medical exposures (97/43/EURATOM). J Radiol Prot 1998; 18: 133-137.
- 9. Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, et al. Doctors’ knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 2003; 327: 371-372.
- 10. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. QUDI projects. http://www.ranzcr.edu.au/qualityprograms/qudi/projects.cfm (accessed Jun 2007).
- 11. Zhu X, Yu J, Huang Z. Low-dose chest CT: optimizing radiation protection for patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 809-816.
Richard Mendelson is Editor of the online publication Diagnostic Imaging Pathways.