To the Editor: On the basis of five coroners’ reports, Gibson et al warn of dangers connected to the use of naltrexone implants.1 Two of the deaths occurred after the expected lifetime of the implant, a third after the implant had been removed, and a fourth was partially attributed to naltrexone by the coroner without detailing any physical evidence. Only the fifth case had the potential to support the authors’ claims, with both a relatively high level of naltrexone and opioids present in the blood at the time of death. Still, as toxicological tests showed not only a high level of heroin, but also stimulants and benzodiazepines, the cause of death in this case is open to debate.
Some further comments seem appropriate. First, despite 30 years of scrutiny, systematic reviews find no support for claims of lethal side effects of naltrexone.2 One coroner claiming otherwise in one death does not constitute evidence to the contrary, especially as no further physical evidence was presented. Second, any discontinuation of a lifesaving medication is followed by a period of increased vulnerability. This is a problem naltrexone treatment shares with all treatments for this group,3 and indeed with most other medications designed to protect against premature death. In opioid addiction, patients die from overdose, and if their medication is discontinued, a larger proportion will do so. If prospective studies prove that opioid overdose can occur during naltrexone implant treatment, it would only be advisable to restrict the use of implants if the death rate proved higher than similar rates in maintenance treatment. Third, in the absence of high-quality evidence, authors will have to make logical arguments as to why they prefer one explanation over the alternatives. However, Gibson et al did neither, even though alternatives are readily available in the literature; for example, it is well known that sudden and unexpected death can occur as a consequence of the use of recreational doses of non-opioid drugs.4
