Connect
MJA
MJA

“Failure to thrive” or failure to use the right growth chart?

Barbara Radcliffe, Jan E Payne, Helen Porteous and Simone G Johnston
Med J Aust 2007; 186 (12): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01092.x
Published online: 18 June 2007

To the Editor: Growth charts are important tools in assessing the physical development of infants and children. Understanding and comparing the derivation and applicability of the new World Health Organization Child Growth Standards1 and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts2 is essential.


  • 1 Southern Brisbane and Logan Breastfeeding Promotion and Training Coalition, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 2 School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD.


Correspondence: j.payne@qut.edu.au

  • 1. World Health Organization. The WHO Child Growth Standards. http://www.who.int/childgrowth/en/index.html (accessed Apr 2007).
  • 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. WHO Child Growth Standards. http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/who_standards.htm (accessed Apr 2007).
  • 3. de Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Borghi E. Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts. J Nutr 2007 137: 144-148.
  • 4. Binns C, Lee M. Will the new WHO growth references do more harm than good? [letter]. Lancet 2006; 368: 1868-1869.
  • 5. Olsen EM. Failure to thrive: still a problem of definition. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2006 Jan-Feb; 45: 1-6.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.