Australians look forward to dividends from increased funding
Despite our relatively small population, Australia has made an impressive global impact in health and medical research (HMR). Our research output is twice the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) average on a per capita basis,1 with high international visibility by citation,2-4 and Australia boasts five Nobel Prizes in Physiology or Medicine. HMR is a “golden egg”. Its consequences — disease prevention, improved longevity and quality of life — reduce hospital admissions and stays, and contribute to both workforce productivity and wealth creation. Examples of outstanding success in Australian translational HMR include Frazer’s cervical cancer vaccine, Cade’s use of lithium for treating bipolar disorder, Clark’s bionic ear technology, and Marshall and Warren’s unravelling of the role of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer. The Access Economics report commissioned by the Australian Society for Medical Research in 2003 put figures on the value of the golden egg: every dollar invested in health research and development (R&D) yields an average annual return of $5.5
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Centre for Vascular Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
- 1. Grant J (Chairman). Sustaining the virtuous cycle — for a healthy, competitive Australia. Investment review of health and medical research. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2004. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/health-hsid-investreview (accessed Aug 2006).
- 2. Wills PJ (Chairman). The virtuous cycle. Working together for health and medical research. Health and medical research strategic review. Discussion document. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1998. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/content/hmrsr.htm (accessed Aug 2006).
- 3. Garrett-Jones S, Wixted B, Turpin T. Some international benchmarks for evaluating Australian health and medical research. Res Eval 2004; 13: 155-166.
- 4. Bourke P, Butler L. Mapping Australia’s basic research in the medical and health sciences. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 610-613. <MJA full text>
- 5. Access Economics. Exceptional returns: the value of investing in health R&D in Australia. 2003. http://www.asmr.org.au/news/newsletters/pubi.html (accessed Aug 2006).
- 6. Van Der Weyden MB. Modernising the National Health and Medical Research Council [editorial]. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 340-342. <MJA full text>
- 7. Anderson W. Ten challenges for Australian health and medical research. Aust Soc Med Res Newsletter 2005; April: 2-3. http://www.asmr.org.au/news/newsletters/AP05New.pdf (accessed Aug 2006).
- 8. Bishop JM, Varmus H. Re-aim blame for NIH’s hard times. Science 2006; 312: 499.