To the Editor: The discussion of fibrinolysis in the recently published guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 20061 is interesting. The recommendations clearly indicate that second-generation agents should be preferred to streptokinase in all circumstances. The guidelines reference the GUSTO-I trial data2 as the primary support for those recommendations. These data are, at best, debatable in terms of showing any benefit of front-loaded tissue plasminogen activator over streptokinase, and then only in limited circumstances (ie, patients aged less than 75 years with anterior infarcts and within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms).3,4
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW.
- 1. Acute Coronary Syndrome Guidelines Working Group. Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2006. Med J Aust 2006; 184 (8 Suppl): S1-S32. <MJA full text>
- 2. The GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 673-682.
- 3. Ridker PM, O’Donnell C, Marder VJ, Hennekens CH. Large-scale trials of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: GISSI-2, ISIS-3, and GUSTO-1. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 530-532.
- 4. Brophy JM, Joseph L. Placing trials in context using Bayesian analysis: GUSTO revisited by Reverend Bayes. JAMA 1995; 273: 871-875.