Do women in rural and remote areas need different guidelines for management of low-grade abnormalities found on cervical screening?

• 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, James Cook University School of Medicine
• 2 Cairns Base Hospital, PO Box 902, Cairns QLD 4870.

---

• 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cervical screening in Australia 2001–2002. Canberra: AIHW, 2004. (AIHW Cat. No. CAN 22; Cancer series No. 27.) Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/publications/index.cfm/title/10069 (accessed Jan 2006).
• 2. Coory M, Baade P, Muller J. Cancer incidence, mortality and survival by rurality and socio-economic status in Queensland. Brisbane: Health Information Centre, Queensland Health, 2001.
• 3. National Health and Medical Research Council. Screening to prevent cervical cancer: guidelines for management of asymptomatic women with screen-detected abnormalities. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1994. Available at: http://www.csp.nsw.gov.au/downloads/wh16.pdf (accessed Jan 2006).
• 4. Women’s Cancer Screening Services. Queensland Cervical Screening Program State Plan 2002–2006. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 2002.
• 5. Quinlivan JA, Petersen R, Gani L, Tan J. Demographic variables routinely collected at colposcopic examination do not predict who will default from conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 48-51.
• 6. National Health and Medical Research Council. Screening to prevent cervical cancer: guidelines for the management of asymptomatic women with screen detected abnormalities. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2005. Available at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/_files/wh39.pdf (accessed Jan 2006).