To the Editor: The article by Baker et al was a timely review of managing anticoagulation therapy and balancing the risks of thrombosis and bleeding.1 However, in managing anticoagulation therapy before non-cardiac surgery in patients with mechanical cardiac valve prostheses, the suggested 5-day cessation of warfarin therapy, with only subcutaneous heparin cover, is not appropriate. I have had three patients with mechanical bileaflet mitral prostheses develop valve thrombosis while under this protocol, two with a fatal outcome. I have also had one patient with a mechanical bileaflet aortic valve develop a popliteal arterial embolus requiring thrombectomy, despite being treated according to the protocol.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Suite 6.5, Victorian Heart Centre, Epworth Hospital, 89 Bridge Road, Richmond, VIC 3121.
- 1. Baker RI, Coughlin PB, Gallus AS, et al. Warfarin reversal: consensus guidelines, on behalf of the Australasian Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 492-497. <eMJA full text>
- 2. Andersen PV, Aagaard J. Low-dose warfarin in patients with carbomedics heart valve prostheses. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2000; 8: 11-14.
- 3. Van Nooten GJ, Van Belleghem Y, Caes F et al. Lower intensity anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves: a new concept with the ATS bileaflet aortic valve. J Heart Valve Dis 2003; 12: 495-502.
- 4. Acar J, Iung B, Boissel JP, et al. Multicentre randomised comparison of low-dose versus standard-dose anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves. Circulation 1996; 94: 2107-2116.