Connect
MJA
MJA

Abortion: time to clarify Australia’s confusing laws

Selena R Ewing
Med J Aust 2005; 182 (2): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06591.x
Published online: 17 January 2005

To the Editor: de Crespigny and Savulescu1 criticise legal and media attention given to the abortion of a 32-week fetus with suspected dwarfism in a case in which the expectant mother had become suicidal. At the same time, they appeal to populism to support legislative change in favour of easier access to late-term abortion.


  • Southern Cross Bioethics Institute, North Plympton, SA.


Correspondence: sewing@bioethics.org.au

  • 1. de Crespigny LJ, Savulescu J. Abortion: time to clarify Australia’s confusing laws. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 201-203. <eMJA full text>

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.