MJA
MJA

Chemical–biological–radiological (CBR) response: a template for hospital emergency departments

David A Bradt
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (3): . || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05111.x
Published online: 3 February 2003

To the Editor: The article by Tan and Fitzgerald1 raises numerous concerns. The authors report that their recommended personal protective equipment (PPE) conforms to standards "in a hospital environment where the chemical vapour concentration will not be high". At the same time, the authors acknowledge data indicating most patients from a disaster will present to the local hospital by private transport (ie, without triage, decontamination, or prehospital care). These two considerations are incompatible and further ignore the possibility of the hospital as a direct terrorist target. The authors' assertion that their three decontamination lines "allow mass casualties, as well as trolleys and equipment, to be decontaminated quickly, efficiently, and in an orderly fashion" is simply not evidence based.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.