To the Editor: Comments made by Parker et al1 in response to Leeder and Rychetnik's article on evidence-based medicine (EBM)2 do not reflect the reality of the dilemmas clinicians face in practice — arguably, because of political misuse of the concept of EBM, which Leeder and Rychetnik warned against.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
Correspondence: ganaf@ozemail.com.au
- 1. Parker MH, Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP. Ethics and evidence-based medicine [letter]. Med J Aust 2001; 176: 138. <eMJA full text>
- 2. Leeder SR, Rychetnik L. Ethics and evidence-based medicine. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 161-164.
- 3. Doidge N. In: Cameron PM, Ennis J, Deadman JC, editors. Standards and guidelines for the psychotherapies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1998.
- 4. Doidge N, Simon B, Gillies LA, Ruskin R. Characteristics of psychoanalytic patients under a nationalised health plan: DSM-III-R diagnoses, previous treatment and childhood trauma. Am J Psych 1994; 151: 586-590.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.