Increasing subspecialisation, driven by new knowledge, experience and technology, challenges the relevance of a broad discipline like general internal medicine. However, these same influences are also responsible for the worldwide renaissance of generalism in clinical practice.1 With an ageing population, an increasing prevalence of chronic disease, rising costs of healthcare, greater consumer expectations, and more awareness of the risks and errors of clinical practice, our society needs general internal medicine to provide integrated, cost-effective and high quality specialist medical care. This need is even greater for people with complex, multisystem problems, who account for most acute hospital admissions.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4102.
- 2 Department of General Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3051.
- 1. Scott IA, Greenberg PB. General internal medicine in Australia and New Zealand — a renaissance. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 104-105. <eMJA full text>
- 2. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence-based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ 1995; 310: 1122-1126.
- 3. Wilson RL, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, et al. The Quality in Australian Healthcare Study. Med J Aust 1995; 163: 458-471.
- 4. Ellwood PM. Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1549-1556.
- 5. Scottish Intercollegiate Working Party. Acute medical admissions and the future of general medicine. Edinburgh: Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 1998.