Enter our Bookroom for Guides Books

  eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Editorial

White coats and the medical profession

Time to rediscover the symbol of our purpose and our pride?

MJA 2001; 174: 324-325

  Ask doctors to nominate the symbols of their profession and many will select the Hippocratic Oath or the serpented staff of Aesculapius. Ask the same question of a person in the street and the stethoscope or the doctor's black bag are common responses. However, the most recognisable symbol of the profession is the white coat.1 Indeed, media portrayal of doctors in Marcus Welby MD or ER showcases the obligatory white coat and dangling stethoscope.

Doctors first wore white coats in the late 19th century when science began to make significant inroads into medicine and physicians adopted the laboratory coat as their own.1 Its initial purpose was to protect the patient and physician from cross-contamination, but, as the partnership between science and medicine2 transformed hospitals from institutions for the dying to centres for curing the sick, the white coat became a potent symbol of the authority of science and the art of healing. Superimpose on this metamorphosis Western cultural connotations of whiteness — "life, purity, innocence, superhuman power, goodness — and it is easy to see how the white coat became the favored garment for physicians".1,3

However, as the 20th century advanced, and sociologists turned their attention to medicine4,5 and the dynamics of the patient-doctor relationship, the white coat was seen increasingly as a barrier to effective communication. In an attempt to dispel this perception, paediatricians, psychiatrists and doctors in private practice shed the white coat. Furthermore, the changes in society and healthcare that turned doctors into "healthcare providers" and patients into "clients, consumers or customers" also witnessed the extinction of the white-coated doctor. Today, doctors in our hospitals have become a hidden species, virtually indistinguishable from other hospital personnel or even patients' visitors.

But what do Australian patients want doctors to wear? In this issue of the Journal, Harnett explores this question.6 Among patients attending oncology clinics, a clear majority preferred junior doctors to wear white coats "for identification purposes" or because "it looked more professional". For senior doctors, the issue was not as clear-cut, but many of the patients still preferred these doctors to wear white coats.

These findings are not surprising. There is now substantive information that adult patients prefer doctors in clinics and hospitals to be traditionally, or at least smartly, dressed;7-12 to wear a necktie;7-9,11,12 to have short hair;8,10,12 and to wear white coats with a name tag.7,8,10-12

Does all this foreshadow a rebirth of doctors in white coats? Probably not. Most of the current information on patients' preferences for doctors' attire is derived from limited cross-sectional surveys. In the current era of evidence-based healthcare, any return of the white coat awaits the outcome of a randomised controlled trial to settle the question: to be or not to be in a white coat!

And yet, the practice of medicine involves more than its subservience to evidence or science. It also involves issues such as the meaning of service and feelings of professional pride. In this context, the white coat has become a symbol for the humane face of medicine and its professionalism in the newly discovered white coat ceremonies.13 To date a uniquely North American phenomenon, these ceremonies are performed each year for students entering US medical schools. The students (accompanied by friends and families) are welcomed into the profession by the assembled faculty of the medical school. After an address by an eminent member of the profession, each student is presented with, and helped into, his or her white coat by the dean and other faculty members. This robing ceremony is followed by a public proclamation by the students of their professional commitment akin to the Hippocratic Oath. Inaugurated in 1993 by the Arnold P Gold Foundation, the white coat ceremony had already been adopted by 93 US medical schools some five years later,14 suggesting a groundswell in the search for meaning in service to the community in medicine and in professionalism.

The Foundation has identified six components of the ceremony to "help create an environment which fosters a psychological contract for professionalism and empathy in medicine".13 These include

  • The presence of friends and families "representing the support and value system closest to the student";

  • The welcome by the dean and faculty of the school and its hospitals "representing the value system of the school and the new profession they are about to enter";

  • An inspiring address by a physician role-model;

  • The personal robing with the white coat through which senior doctors "demonstrate their belief in the student's ability to carry on the noble tradition of doctoring";

  • A public proclamation by the students of the Hippocratic Oath or a similar declaration representing their "willingness to assume the obligations and responsibilities of the medical profession"; and

  • A reception celebrating the students' new professional status "to reinforce an important and memorable moment".

The white coat ceremony is not without its critics who question its appropriateness and perceive a darker symbolism;3 nor are there comparable exercises in Australian medical schools. In these troubled times of uncertainty and confusion in medicine, might not the time be right to rediscover the white coat as a symbol of our purpose and our pride as a profession?

Martin B Van Der Weyden
Editor
Medical Journal of Australia

  1. Blumhagen DW. The doctor's white coat. The image of the physician in modern America. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91: 95-119.
  2. Weatheral D. Science and the quiet art. Medical research and patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995: 55-88.
  3. Wear D. On white coats and professional development: the formal and the hidden curricula. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 734-737.
  4. Annandale E. The sociology of health and medicine. A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998: 4-32.
  5. Freidson E. Profession of medicine. New York: Harper and Rowe, 1970.
  6. Harnett PR. Should doctors wear white coats ? Med J Aust 2001; 174: 343-344.
  7. Dunn JJ, Lee TH, Percelay JM, et al. Patient and house officer attitudes on physician attire and etiquette. JAMA 1987; 257: 65-68.
  8. Gjerdingen DW, Simpson DE, Titus SL. Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the physician's professional appearance. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 1209-1212.
  9. McKinstry B, Wang J-X. Putting on the style: what patients think of the way their doctor dresses. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41: 275-278.
  10. Hennessy N, Harrison DA, Aitkenhead AR. The effect of the anaesthetist's attire on patient attitudes. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 219-222.
  11. Gledhill JA, Warner JP, King M. Psychiatrists and their patients: views on forms of dress and address. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 171: 228-232.
  12. Menahem S, Shvartzman P. Is our appearance important to our patients? Fam Pract 1998; 15: 391-397.
  13. Gillon R. White coat ceremonies for new medical students. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 83-84.
  14. Branch WT Jr. Deconstructing the white coat. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 740-742.

©MJA 2001
Make a comment

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  


Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further reproduction or distribution of the articles should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For permission, contact the Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".

<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/> © 2001 Medical Journal of Australia.