|
The Profession
Should doctors wear white coats?
Paul R Harnett
MJA 2001; 174: 343-344
For editorial comment, see Van Der Weyden
The wearing of white coats by hospital doctors is becoming a rarity,
making it difficult for patients to identify doctors from other
hospital staff. I asked patients with cancer whether they thought
that doctors, both junior and senior, should wear white coats. Only a
minority disapproved.
→ Other articles have cited this article
Asking the patients -
Patients' responses -
Discussion -
Acknowledgements -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Administration and health services -
More articles on General medicine
| |
The white coat is a well established symbol of the medical profession.
In more than 90 medical schools in the United States its symbolism is
recognised by formal ceremonies at which students are awarded the
"right" or distinction of wearing a white coat to emphasise the
humanistic values of medicine.1,2 Among the many recent
changes in the way medicine is practised, one little-studied change
has been the addition of "white-coated" doctors to the "endangered
species" list in many hospitals. Although some relatively isolated
pockets of this species remain, their numbers continue to decline. In
many hospitals they are now so rare as to prompt comment, if not
amusement, when observed by chance "in the wild".
Subtle societal changes have been proposed as a reason for the demise
of white-coated doctors -- modern-day patients may find the use of a
white coat to be an inappropriate status symbol or a barrier to
effective communication. In particular, in paediatric practice it
has been suggested that white coats may be an impediment, although
studies have failed to confirm this.3,4
I investigated the phenomenon of the disappearing white coat doctors
in my environment by asking oncology patients about their attitudes
to doctors and white coats. I was prompted to do this by remarks from
patients indicating that identification of doctors and nurses in
hospitals was an issue of concern.
|
| |
Patients attending the oncology outpatient clinics of three Sydney
hospitals in September and October 1999 completed a short
questionnaire about whether junior and senior doctors in hospitals
should wear white coats. Patients could "agree", "disagree", or
respond "I don't care". They could give reasons for their choice
either by agreeing with suggested options ("for identification
purposes", "looks more professional" or "for reasons of hygiene"),
or by free-text response.
|
| |
Questionnaires were returned by 180 patients (47 men, 113 women [20
did not specify their sex]; age range, < 20-90 years [32 did not give
their age]). Only 153 patients responded to questions about senior
doctors, which were on the reverse side of the page.
|
Junior doctors |
- 106 respondents (59%; 95% CI, 52.8%-67.2%) agreed that junior
doctors should wear white coats; 17 disagreed (9%; 95% CI,
4.8%-13.2%), and 57 patients (32%; 95% CI, 25.2%-38.8%) responded " I
don't care". The same general pattern was seen for both men and women.
- Reasons for agreeing (46 respondents): "for identification
purposes"(41); "looks more professional" (36); and "reasons of
hygiene" (6).
- Reasons for disagreeing (31 respondents): white coat a barrier to
communication between doctor and patient (10); wearing a coat was a
choice for the individual doctor (6); and avoiding additional cost.
|
Senior doctors |
- 61 respondents (40%; 95% CI, 32.2%-47.8%) answered that
senior doctors should wear white coats; 32 disagreed (21%; 95%
CI, 14.5%-27.5%) and 60 (39%; 95% CI, 31.3%-46.7%) said "I don't
care".
- Reasons for agreeing (28 respondents): white coats look more
professional or assist in identification (22); and hygiene (3).
- Reasons for disagreeing (34 respondents): not wearing white coats
distinguishes senior doctors from junior doctors, and white coats
distance doctors from patients (11).
Patients who preferred junior doctors to wear white coats were also
likely to prefer senior doctors in white coats. The proportion of
patients disagreeing with doctors' wearing white coats reduced
significantly with advancing patient age (P = 0.01, by
logistic regression analysis).
|
|
|
A clear majority of respondents thought that junior doctors should
wear white coats (only 9% disagreed), but the situation was less clear
for senior doctors, with roughly equal numbers of respondents either
agreeing that senior doctors should wear white coats or indicating
they didn't care. Our results contrast with the current practice in
many Australian hospitals (including those I work in) where junior
doctors no longer wear white coats.
Many respondents who supported the wearing of white coats for junior
and senior doctors agreed that white coats looked more professional
or assisted in identification. Interestingly, reasons related to
infection control or hygiene were uncommon. Of the 20% of respondents
who disagreed with white coats for senior doctors, most referred to
white coats as being some sort of a barrier.
As with all questionnaires, the data are potentially subject to bias.
The number of questionnaires distributed was not recorded, making it
impossible to exclude bias from an unbalanced sample. Patients who
declined to complete the survey may have had a preference for, or
against, the wearing of white coats. However, anecdotal evidence
from hospital staff is that patient refusal to participate was rare.
That the doctors at the hospitals surveyed do not wear white coats
could influence patient responses. Perhaps patients did not express
stronger support for senior doctors' wearing white coats for fear of
displeasing their attending doctor. If so, our data would
underestimate patients' preferences for senior doctors' wearing
white coats.
Many patients raised the issue of white coats with their doctor after
completing the questionnaire. This feedback indicates that
identification of hospital staff is a significant problem for
patients, magnified by degrees of debility and dependence. Patients
often have difficulty distinguishing the relative roles of staff
wearing corporate uniforms (ie, nurses, clerical staff, kitchen
staff, etc); name tags were difficult to read and insufficient for
identification. Similar studies of patients' views of non-medical
apparel in hospitals may be instructive.
If, from the patients' perspective, the greatest usefulness of the
white coat is its value as a rapid means of staff identification, then
to simply recommend reintroduction of white coats may be premature,
especially if an alternative, effective means of staff
identification can be implemented.
I do not believe that the results would be greatly different in other
Australian settings, and recent reports from international
clinical settings suggest qualitatively similar
results.5,6 Our findings confirm that
the clinical environment and medical interaction are complex, and
that individual patients hold differing views. However, our data do
not suggest that the clinical environment has changed to one that
favours extinction of white-coated doctors.
|
| |
Thanks are due to colleagues in the Department of Medical Oncology and
Palliative Care at Westmead, Blacktown and Nepean Hospitals. The
data management input by Shoma Barat is appreciated. Special thanks
are due to the patients who offered their views for this study.
Competing interests: None.
|
|
|
- Branch WT Jr. Deconstructing the white coat [editorial]. Ann
Intern Med 1998; 129: 740-742.
-
Wear D. On white coats and professional development: the formal and
the hidden curricula. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 734-737.
-
McCarthy JJ, McCarthy MC, Eilert RE. Children's and parents'
visual perception of physicians. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1999;
38: 145-152.
-
Matsui D, Cho M, Rieder MJ. Physicians' attire as perceived by young
children and their parents: the myth of the white coat syndrome.
Pediatr Emerg Care 1998; 14: 198-201.
-
Menahem S, Shvartzman P. Is our appearance important to our
patients? Fam Pract 1998; 15: 391-397.
-
Ikusaka M, Kamegai M, Sunaga T, et al. Patients' attitudes toward
consultations by a physician without a white coat in Japan. Intern
Med 1999; 38: 533-536.
|
| |
Department of Medical Oncology and Palliative Care, Westmead
Hospital, Sydney, NSW
Paul R Harnett, MB BS, FRACP, PhD, Director of Cancer
Services, Westmead and Nepean Hospitals.
Reprints will not be available from the author. Correspondence: Dr P R
Harnett, Department of Medical Oncology and Palliative Care,
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145.
harnettprATwestgate.wh.usyd.edu.au
©MJA 2001
Make a
comment
Other articles have cited this article:
Balakrishnan R Nair, John R Attia, Stephen R Mears and Karen I Hitchcock. Evidence-based physicians' dressing: a crossover trial Med J Aust 2002; 177 (11/12): 681-682. [Christmas Offerings] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/177_11_021202/nai10445_fm.html>
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2001 Medical Journal of Australia.
|
|
| |
| |
| Back to text |
|