Connect
MJA
MJA

The shortage of medical oncologists: the Australian Medical Oncologist Workforce Study

Prunella L Blinman, Peter Grimison, Michael B Barton, Sally Crossing, Euan T Walpole, Nora Wong, Kay Francis and Bogda Koczwara
Med J Aust 2012; 196 (1): 58-61. || doi: 10.5694/mja11.10363
Published online: 16 January 2012
Methods
Additional sources of data

Data were obtained from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) about the numbers of medical oncology advanced trainees registered with the RACP and trainees awarded fellowship between 2005 and 2009. The number of new cases of cancer reported in Australia in 2008 was obtained from state and territory cancer registries.10 The projected number of new cases of cancer in Australia during 2014 assumed a growth of 2% per year.10 The populations of each state and territory in June 2009 were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics.11 An optimal chemotherapy utilisation rate of 51% was based on previous modelling.12 Optimal workloads of 150 and 180 new patients seen per FTE MO per year were based on Canadian and Australian benchmarks.1,13

Results
Current supply

Of 476 medical oncology positions, 49% comprised FTE MOs (Box 2). Three-quarters of the FTE MOs were found in the three most populous states or territories (New South Wales, Victoria and Queensland). The national average FTE per medical oncology position was 0.5, and almost one-third of the medical oncology positions (29%) were filled by women. There were more medical oncology positions in public than private practices. Few medical oncology positions were located in rural centres.

Workload

49 073 new patients with cancer were reported to have been seen in 2008, 43% of the 115 126 estimated new cases of cancer.10 An average of 270 new patients were reported to have been seen per FTE MO. 21 954 new patients seen in 2008 (45%) received at least one course of chemotherapy, with an average of 160 (ranging from 94 in South Australia to 198 in NSW) new patients receiving chemotherapy per FTE MO. The national chemotherapy utilisation rate was 19%.

Current and projected demand

For an optimal workload of 150 new patients/FTE MO/year, the demand for FTE MOs was 391 in 2009 and 432 in 2014 (Box 3). For an optimal workload of 180 new patients, the demand was 326 in 2009 and 361 in 2014. The highest demand (over optimal workload) for FTE MOs was in NSW.

Discussion

We identified a current shortage of MOs in Australia, expected to persist in the future. A conservative estimate of the current supply, demand and shortfall of MOs was 234, 326 and 92 FTE respectively (at a workload of 150 new patients/FTE MO/year). Shortfalls of MOs were found in all states and territories and in metropolitan and rural centres.

MOs in Australia in 2008 had a high clinical workload compared with international benchmarks. The average number of new patients per FTE MO of 270 is well above Canadian recommendations of 160 to 1751 and the suggested Australian benchmark of 150 new patients per year.13 Reduction of this clinical workload requires training more than double the estimated shortage of FTE MOs, given that the average FTE per MO was 0.5 (Box 2). The increasing diversification of MOs into non-clinical roles will only increase the demand on clinical responsibilities should the shortage not be addressed.

The national chemotherapy utilisation rate was surprisingly low, and well below the evidence-based Australian standard of 51%.12 This is of concern because it implies that some patients who may benefit from chemotherapy are not receiving it. Possible explanations for a low chemotherapy utilisation rate include suboptimal referral rates of patients with cancer, patients referred with advanced rather than early stage cancer, and low prescribing rates of chemotherapy to new patients with cancer. We suspect that we have underestimated the chemotherapy utilisation rate, because only one-third of centres (representing about 60% of the total national MO workload) reported the number of new patients who received chemotherapy. However, even correcting for the underestimate, it is unlikely that chemotherapy utilisation in Australia approximates expected standards.

The number of trainees was greater than the number MOs expected to retire. This suggests that the supply of MOs should be able to meet the increased demand over the next 5 years, assuming full integration of the trainees into the medical oncology workforce. However, allowing for part-time work practices, overseas placements and maternity and other leave, the increasing supply of trainees does not allow for a substantial increase in the capacity of the medical oncology workforce to address the current shortage. Supplementation of the workforce by OTPs is welcome, but is limited by their uncertain supply.

Although not directly comparable, our findings are similar to the results of the most recent study of the oncology workforce in the US,7 and studies of the medical workforce in other oncology specialties such as radiation oncology14 and palliative care.15 The US study found that demand for MOs is expected to rise by 48% between 2005 and 2020, but supply will only rise 14%, translating into a shortfall of 2550 to 4080 oncologists (about one-quarter to one-third of the 2005 supply).

Our study has several limitations. The response rate of 81% was acceptable, but may not have been high enough to generalise the results to all MOs and practices in Australia. Lead clinicians, rather than individual MOs, were surveyed to maximise the response rate, but this was at the cost of detailed knowledge about workplace patterns of individual MOs. Only the clinical workload of MOs relating to chemotherapy was included, so the results may have underestimated the true workload of MOs in Australia, which also includes other systemic therapies such as hormonal therapy. Our study highlighted the lack of basic data collection at some oncology practices. Some responses were estimated rather than counted, and many centres were unable to provide any data about workload. This reduced the accuracy of the results and is likely to have underestimated the workload relating to new patients.

Despite these limitations, we provide a snapshot of the current medical oncology workforce in Australia, and an estimate of the current and future workforce shortages. Addressing the shortage needs a multilevel approach aimed at increasing the supply of MOs by increasing recruitment, training and participation rates, improving clinical practice efficiency, and the introduction of innovative methods of service delivery through involvement of other health professionals and use of models of shared care.

Tailored national strategies will be necessary to ensure an adequate medical oncology workforce in the future, and ongoing monitoring will be needed to guide and promote the strategies.

2 Medical oncology positions in Australia in 2008

NSW

VIC

QLD

WA

SA

TAS

ACT

NT

National


Population*

7 099 700

5 427 800

4 406 800

2 236 900

1 622 700

502 600

351 200

224 800

21 874 900

MOs (% of national)

138 (29%)

176 (37%)

63 (13%)

41 (9%)

28 (6%)

11 (2%)

18 (4%)

1 (0.2%)

476 (100%)

FTE MOs

FTE MOs filled (% of national)

88 (35%)

68 (29%)

29 (12%)

22 (9%)

20 (9%)

6 (3%)

7 (3%)

1 (0.4%)

234 (100%)

FTE MOs unfilled (% of national)

7.5 (26%)

8.0 (28%)

6.3 (22%)

0

3.6 (13%)

2.0 (7%)

1.1 (4%)

0

29 (100%)

Total FTE MOs (% of national)

89 (34%)

76 (29%)

35 (14%)

22 (8%)

24 (9%)

8 (3%)

8 (3%)

1 (0.4%)

263 (100%)

Average FTE per MO

0.6

0.4

0.5

0.5

0.7

0.5

0.4

1

0.5

FTE MOs per 100 000 population

1.2

1.3

0.8

1.0

1.5

1.2

1.9

0.4

1.1

Female MOs (% of MO)

46 (33%)

49 (28%)

20 (32%)

9 (22%)

9 (32%)

3 (27%)

4 (22%)

0

140 (29%)

MOs by practice type (% of MOs)

Public

73 (53%)

90 (51%)

38 (60%)

21 (51%)

13 (46%)

9 (82%)

10 (56%)

1 (100%)

255 (54%)

Private

50 (36%)

85 (49%)

24 (38%)

20 (49%)

15 (53%)

2 (18%)

8 (44%)

0

204 (43%)

Other

15 (11%)

1 (0.6%)

1 (2%)

0

0

0

0

0

17 (4%)

MOs by practice place (% of MOs)

Metropolitan

131 (95%)

172 (98%)

58 (92%)

30 (73%)

28 (100%)

11 (100%)

18 (100%)

1 (100%)

449 (94%)

Rural

7 (5%)

4 (2%)

5 (8%)

11 (27%)

0

0

0

0

27 (6%)


NSW = New South Wales. VIC = Victoria. QLD = Queensland. WA = Western Australia. SA = South Australia. TAS = Tasmania. ACT = Australian Capital Territory. NT = Northern Territory. MO = medical oncologist. FTE = full-time equivalent. * At 30 June 2009.

Received 28 March 2011, accepted 5 September 2011

  • Prunella L Blinman1
  • Peter Grimison2
  • Michael B Barton3
  • Sally Crossing4
  • Euan T Walpole5
  • Nora Wong6
  • Kay Francis6
  • Bogda Koczwara7

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Sydney Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW.
  • 3 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
  • 4 Cancer Voices NSW, Sydney, NSW.
  • 5 Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD.
  • 6 Medical Oncology Group of Australia, Sydney, NSW.
  • 7 Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.



Competing interests:

No relevant disclosures.

  • 1. Systemic Therapy Task Force. STTF Report. Ontario: Cancer Care Ontario, 2000. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/common/pages/UserFile.aspx?fileId=14436 (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 2. Erikson C, Salsberg E, Forte G, et al. Future supply and demand for oncologists: challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Pract 2007; 3: 79-86.
  • 3. Hortobagyi GN; American Society of Clinical Oncology. A shortage of oncologists? The American Society of Clinical Oncology workforce study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 1468-1469.
  • 4. Warren JL, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, et al. Current and future utilization of services from medical oncologists. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3242-3247.
  • 5. Barrett J. Building for the future. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009; 21: 573-574.
  • 6. Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee. The specialist medical and haematological oncology workforce in Australia: supply, requirements and projections, 2001–2011. Sydney: AMWAC, 2001. http://www.ahwo. gov.au/publications.asp (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 7. Association of American Medical Colleges Center for Workforce Studies. Forecasting the supply of and demand for oncologists: a report to the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Alexandria, Va: ASCO, 2007. http://www.asco. org/ASCO/Downloads/Cancer%20Research/Oncology%20Workforce%20Report%20FINAL.pdf (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 8. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program. SEER*Rx Interactive Antineoplastic Drugs Database, version 1.5.0. Bethesda, Md: NCI, 2010. http://www.seer. cancer.gov/tools/seerrx/ (accessed Nov 2011).
  • 9. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural, Remote and Metropolitan Area (RRMA) classification. Canberra: AIHW, 2011. http://www. aihw.gov.au/rural-health-rrma-classification/ (accessed Dec 2011).
  • 10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australasian Association of Cancer Registries. Cancer in Australia 2010: an overview. Canberra: AIHW, 2010. (AIHW Cat. No. CAN 56; Cancer Series No. 60.) http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442472459 (accessed Dec 2011).
  • 11. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian demographic statistics, Jun 2009. Canberra: ABS, 2009. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/EB76EA379A 44E842CA2576F0001C70C9?opendocument (accessed Dec 2011).
  • 12. Ng WL, Jacob S, Delaney G, et al. Optimal chemotherapy utilization rate in cancer care: setting an evidence-based benchmark for quality improvement. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28 (15 Suppl): abstract 6099.
  • 13. Barton M, Gabriel GS, Shafiq J. Overview of cancer treatment services in Western Australia July 2008. Perth: Cancer Council Western Australia, 2008. http://www.cancerwa.asn.au/resources/Overview_of_cancer_treatment_services_in_Western_Australia.pdf (accessed Dec 2011).
  • 14. Morgan G, Wigg D, Childs J. Projected requirements for radiation oncologists and trainees in Australia and New Zealand to 2007. Australas Radiol 2000; 44: 88-97.
  • 15. Chiarella M, Duffield C. Workforce issues in palliative and end-of-life care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2007; 9: 334-341.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.