Medical academics Christine Jorm and Michael Frommer believe it is simply the right thing to do
For vast amounts of performance data are collected in the Australian health system, many of which are released by agencies such as the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, state and territory health departments and the Australian Bureau of Statistics. However, merely releasing performance data is different from publicly reporting such data. Public reporting incorporates interpretation and comparisons that make the data meaningful for the community.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Fung C, Lim Y, Mattke S, et al. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves the quality of care. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 111-123.
- 2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Developing a safety and quality framework for Australia. Sydney: ACSQHC, 2009.
- 3. Kelman S, Friedman J. Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: an empirical examination of impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English National Health Service. Cambridge, Mass.: John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard, 2007.
- 4. Bridgewater B, Grayson AD, Brooks N, et al. Has the publication of cardiac surgery outcome data been associated with changes in practice in northwest England: an analysis of 25 730 patients undergoing CABG surgery under 30 surgeons over eight years. Heart 2007; 93: 744-748.
- 5. Duckett S, Collins J, Kamp M, Walker K. An improvement focus in public reporting: the Queensland approach. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 616-617. <MJA full text>
None identified.