|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on History
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box

Aleck W Bourne (4 Jun 1886 – 27 Dec 1974)
“I . . . decided to bring forward a test case, in which there would be no real danger to life . . . but in which one might strongly suspect great danger to health. I was also concerned to establish in the eyes of the Law that mental health was just as important as physical health, and in certain cases perhaps even more so.”4
Europe, July 1938: Hitler and his Nuremberg rallies are gaining strength; invasion of Czechoslovakia seems imminent; German concentration camps are under construction; and Chamberlain is seeking appeasement. Meanwhile, in London, the Old Bailey criminal court is staging an unusual trial. In the dock of the austere Edwardian building stands Mr Aleck Bourne, FRCS, FRCOG, Consultant Gynaecologist to London’s St Mary’s Hospital, charged under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 with unlawfully using an instrument to procure an abortion.1
Following the introduction of the harsh measures of the 1861 Act, prosecutions for abortion had been relatively common.2 However, in virtually all cases the defendants were women with little or no medical training, who performed abortions for small fees — so-called backstreet abortionists.3 At any one time, around 50 women convicted of the crime were incarcerated for up to 14 years in London’s Holloway Prison. Motivation was not necessarily purely financial. One woman said, “I knew it was against the law but I didn’t think it was wrong. Women have to help each other”.2
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 1899 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377