We present the first six cases of H1N1 influenza 09 (confirmed by a polymerase chain reaction test from nasopharyngeal swabs) in patients requiring admission to intensive care in Australia (in three hospitals in the north-western suburbs of Melbourne). These cases highlight the small but significant risk of life-threatening respiratory failure associated with H1N1 influenza 09 infection.
A 28-year-old obese woman (body mass index [BMI], 57 kg/m2) presented to the emergency department (ED) with a history of 5 days of sore throat, lethargy and myalgias, and a clear chest x-ray, followed by 2 days of dyspnoea, productive cough, and pleuritic chest pain. She was febrile (40°C), and had tachypnoea (respiratory rate, 36 breaths/min) and hypoxia (oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry [Spo2], 87% on 15 L/min oxygen via face mask). Her admission chest x-ray showed widespread alveolar infiltrates. She had a normal white cell count (WCC) of 6.3 × 109/L, but an elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 221 mg/L (reference ranges shown in Box 1). She was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and, after a brief trial of non-invasive ventilation (NIV), was intubated and treated with mechanical ventilation (MV) with a fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) of 1.0 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 20 cm H2O for the first 24 hours to maintain an Spo2 > 89%. She was treated with inotropes for septic shock and with renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure. Therapy with oseltamivir in addition to empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics was commenced. Bacterial cultures of blood, urine and tracheal aspirate were negative. The result of a test for urine pneumococcal antigen was negative. The patient was successfully weaned from ventilatory support on Day 14.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
We thank the patients or their next of kin who provided consent/authorisation, and the local institutional ethics committees which approved the publication of clinical information.
None identified.