Evidence shows that cost does affect alcohol consumption, and reducing consumption improves public health
There is strong evidence that increasing the cost of alcohol reduces the overall amount that is consumed.1 In a range of countries, price increases have been consistently shown to reduce alcohol consumption and related harms in both the general population and at-risk populations such as young people and heavy drinkers. Conversely, price decreases have resulted in an increase in consumption and harm.1-3 In this context, the Australian Government’s April 2008 increase in excise tax (Bill introduced on 11 February 2009) on ready-to-drink (RTD) spirit-based products (RTDs; “alcopops”) is an evidence-based strategy to reduce excessive RTD consumption among young people. The alcoholic content of RTDs is now taxed at a similar rate to that of other spirits (tax increased from $39.36 to $66.67 per litre of pure alcohol).
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Wagenaar AC, Salois MJ, Komro KA. Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction 2009; 104: 179-190.
- 2. Grossman M, Chaloupka F, Saffer H, Laixuthai A. Effects of alcohol price policy on youth: a summary of economic research. J Res Adolesc 1994; 4: 347-364.
- 3. Collins DJ, Lapsley HM. The avoidable costs of alcohol abuse in Australia and the potential benefits of effective policies to reduce the social costs of alcohol. National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 70. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2008. http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/Content/0A14D387E42AA201CA2574B3000028A8/$File/mono70.pdf (accessed Feb 2009).
- 4. Doran C, Shakeshaft A. Using taxes to curb drinking in Australia. Lancet 2008; 372: 701-702.
- 5. White V, Hayman J. Australian secondary school students’ use of alcohol in 2005. National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No. 58. Melbourne: The Cancer Council Victoria, 2006. http://www.nationaldrugstrategy.gov.au/internet/drugstrategy/publishing.nsf/Content/85D7B21B3E 3A993ECA2572250007755F/$File/mono58.pdf (accessed Feb 2009).
- 6. Hall WD, Chikritzhs TN, d’Abbs PHN, Room RGW. Alcohol sales data are essential for good public policies towards alcohol [editorial]. Med J Aust 2008; 189: 188-189. <MJA full text>
- 7. Nielsen Liquor Services Group. RTD consumption: what’s happened since the RTD excise change? Sydney: NLSG, Sep 2008.
- 8. Oakes L. Sobering stats on alcopops. Daily Telegraph 2008; Aug 2. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24113156-5001031,00.html (accessed Feb 2009).
- 9. Roxon N, Minster for Health and Ageing. Excise Tariff Amendment (2009 Measures No. 1) Bill 2009. Second reading. House of Representatives Votes and Proceedings. Hansard. Wednesday 11 February 2009. Canberra: Parliament of Australia, 2009: 3-6. http://www.aph.gov.au/Hansard/reps/dailys/dr110209.pdf (accessed Feb 2009).
- 10. Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health Cluster, World Health Organization. International guide for monitoring alcohol consumption and related harm. Geneva: WHO, 2000. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2000/WHO_MSD_MSB_00.4.pdf (accessed Feb 2009).
We thank Michael Walton of The Nielsen Company, who advised on the description and interpretation of the alcohol sales data described in this editorial.
The Distilled Spirits Industry Consortium Australia funded the airfare for Steven Allsop to speak on the topic of evidence on effective prevention responses to alcohol problems at a meeting.