MJA
MJA

Acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Fiji: prospective surveillance, 2005–2007

Andrew C Steer, Joseph Kado, Adam W J Jenney, Michael Batzloff, Lepani Waqatakirewa, E Kim Mulholland and Jonathan R Carapetis
Med J Aust 2009; 190 (3): 133-135. || doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02312.x
Published online: 2 February 2009

Rates of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) have remained stable in many developing countries, despite a dramatic decline in the incidence of ARF in industrialised countries in the 20th century.1 Globally, it is estimated that more than 330 000 cases of ARF occur each year in children aged 5–14 years and that over 95% of these cases are found in less developed countries.1 Although there are ample data to support the claim that ARF has virtually disappeared from industrialised nations, there are fewer data from low- and middle-income nations.1,2

The most comprehensive recent descriptions of the clinical manifestations of ARF come from outbreaks in the United States and from the Australian Indigenous population in the Northern Territory; there are few descriptions of the clinical profile of ARF in less developed nations.3,4 Likewise, there are few descriptions of the clinical presentation of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in developing countries.5 We therefore designed a study to characterise the clinical epidemiology of patients admitted to hospital with ARF and RHD in Fiji. This study was part of a series of studies designed to estimate the burden of group A streptococcal disease in Fiji and to prepare for potential clinical trials of group A streptococcal vaccines.

Methods

A prospective enhanced surveillance study was conducted at the Colonial War Memorial Hospital in Fiji’s capital, Suva, over the 23-month period from 5 December 2005 to 5 November 2007. The hospital serves the Central Division of Fiji, which in 2007 had a population of 340 843 people, predominantly comprising the two main ethnic groups of Indigenous Fijians (213 515) and Indo-Fijians (102 799).6

Surveillance and case definition
Acute rheumatic fever

We used the 2002–2003 World Health Organization revision of the Jones Criteria for the diagnosis of ARF.7,8 Patients were defined as having recurrent ARF if they had a bona fide past history of ARF or documented established RHD. We used 80% upper limit of normal cut-off values for both antistreptolysin O (238 IU/mL) and antideoxyribonuclease B (499 IU/mL) titres that were established specifically for the Fijian population in a recent study (for 5–15-year-olds; unpublished data). We also considered a separate category of “probable ARF” for patients who fulfilled the clinical criteria for ARF but did not have raised antistreptococcal antibody titres in a single blood sample as defined by our upper limit.

Statistical analysis

We used population figures from the 2007 national census6 as the basis for denominator calculations for ARF incidence. For comparisons between sexes and ethnic groups, we used incidence rate ratios for ARF, and population-adjusted relative risk for RHD. Data were analysed using Stata, version 10.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Tex, USA).

Results
Rheumatic heart disease

There were 106 patients admitted with RHD as the primary reason for admission. Three patients did not give consent, so detailed demographic and clinical information was available for 103 patients.

The median age of patients presenting with RHD was 26.8 years (IQR, 19.3–42.0 years). There were 31 patients (30%) aged less than 20 years, and the youngest patient was aged 6 years. Forty patients (38%) with no past history of RHD were diagnosed with RHD for the first time (median age, 24.7 years; IQR, 17.3–37.2 years). There were 10 deaths, representing an inhospital fatality rate of 9.7%. The youngest patient who died was 7.6 years old (median age at death, 33.1 years; IQR, 20.1–42.7 years). The relative risk of admission for RHD for females compared with males was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.6–3.8), and the relative risk for Indigenous Fijians compared with other races was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2–2.9).

The clinical features of patients with RHD are summarised in Box 3. Of note, there were 24 pregnant women admitted with RHD. Using obstetric data from the Colonial War Memorial Hospital in 2006 (Dr James Fong, Head of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Colonial War Memorial Hospital, personal communication) as a denominator, the prevalence of RHD in pregnant women in Fiji was 1.8 per 1000 (95% CI, 0.9–3.1).

There were 99 patients with echocardiographic information available. In these patients, the most commonly affected valve was the mitral valve (90 patients). Mitral stenosis occurred in 53 patients, with the youngest of these patients aged 12.9 years.

Discussion

Our findings show that ARF and RHD are significant problems in Fiji, especially in Indigenous Fijians and young people. The incidence of ARF in 5–15-year-olds in our study is comparable to rates in various outbreaks described in the US in the 1980s.3,9,10 The clinical features of ARF in our patient group were also similar to those described during these outbreaks, particularly the high proportion of patients with carditis.

Comparison of our data for ARF incidence in children aged 5–15 years (15.2 per 100 000) with figures from previous reports from Fiji indicates that the incidence of ARF may be declining.11,12 In a study of ARF presentations to hospital in the Western Division of Fiji in 1965–1966, there were 193 admissions for ARF, equating to an annual incidence in children aged 5–14 years of 144 per 100 000.12 The reasons for this change in epidemiology are not clear. However, our data might underestimate the true incidence of ARF in Fiji because our study focused on inpatient admissions and therefore did not detect outpatient presentations,13,14 or because cases of ARF are not being recognised by health care workers,15,16 or because some cases of ARF are very mild and these patients do not present for medical care.4

The prospective systematic approach to the burden of RHD in hospital that we used in this study has not been carried out elsewhere, that we are aware of. However, it is also likely that our data have underestimated the true burden of RHD because hospital admission data only detect patients with severe symptomatic disease, missing outpatients and younger patients with latent RHD. Despite this, our data clearly show that RHD causes a considerable burden of disease in Fiji, accounting for 13 of 14 cases of infective endocarditis and nine of 234 strokes (3.8%) during the study period, and causing significant morbidity in pregnant women.

Previous studies have found an inflated risk of ARF and RHD in Pacific Islanders, consistent with our findings. For example, the Maori population in New Zealand has a rate of ARF at least five times that of white New Zealanders; in Hawaii, Samoan children have a risk of ARF 88 times that of white children; and in the US, Asians and Pacific Islanders account for 6.3% of admissions for ARF, even though they account for only 2.0% of total admissions for any cause (P < 0.05).9,17,18 The reasons for this increased risk are not clear.

The young age of patients with established RHD, the high proportion of stenotic valvular lesions and the high recurrence rate of ARF found in this study all underline the need for effective control. Recently revitalised control efforts are now focused on improved delivery of, and compliance with, secondary prophylaxis, as well as case finding through screening for RHD in school children.15 Other control methods, including a group A streptococcal ARF vaccine, also need to be considered. We found that the incidence of ARF in Fiji was sufficiently high for it to be considered in the future as a clinical endpoint for group A streptococcal vaccine trials.

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.