|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Pharmacology
→ More articles on Obstetrics and gynaecology and women's health
→ More articles on Oncology
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
To the Editor: We question the conclusions drawn by Canfell and colleagues1 from their analysis of trends in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevalence and breast cancer incidence for Australian women aged 50 years or older. Their ecological analysis lacks individual-level information on HRT use and information on tumour oestrogen receptor (ER) status, and captures only 2 years following the decline in HRT prevalence. This is an inadequate design within which to judge issues of causality; it is at best an hypothesis-generating exercise.2
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2009 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377