|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Obstetrics and gynaecology and women's health
→ More articles on Infectious diseases and parasitology
Management of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection in a pregnant woman in Benin using rifampicin and clarithromycin
To the Editor: Buruli ulcer, caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium ulcerans, leads to the destruction of skin and sometimes bone. It has been reported in many tropical countries in Africa and in some temperate regions of Australia, Japan and China.1 In 2004, the World Health Organization recommended treatment with the combination of oral rifampicin and intramuscular streptomycin (or amikacin) for 8 weeks.2,3 In-vitro studies and new data from mouse models suggest that combinations of rifampicin with clarithromycin, rifampicin with moxifloxacin, or clarithromycin with moxifloxacin may be as effective as rifampicin and streptomycin.4,5
In June 2007, a woman who was 6-months pregnant with her first child and had a 7-month history of Buruli ulcer on her right upper limb (Box 1, A) was admitted to the Buruli ulcer treatment centre in Allada, Benin. She was otherwise in good health, and the fetal heart beat was normal. Routine laboratory examinations, including HIV serology tests, found no abnormalities. Swabs from the ulcer were positive for acid-fast bacilli by Ziehl–Neelsen stain, and for IS 2404 (DNA sequence specific for Mycobacterium ulcerans) by polymerase chain reaction testing, but no growth of M. ulcerans was obtained on culture. Histopathological analysis of punch biopsy specimens showed typical features of Buruli ulcer.
As streptomycin is contraindicated in pregnancy, we treated the patient with a combination of oral rifampicin (600 mg daily) and oral clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) for 56 days, beginning 2 weeks after presentation. The treatment was well tolerated. We monitored the clinical response through serial photographs (Box 1) and measurements of the circumference of the affected and unaffected limbs at defined points (Box 2).
The patient gave birth to a healthy boy weighing 2.25 kg in September 2007, 2 weeks after completing antibiotic treatment. She underwent skin grafting a month later. The lesion healed without functional limitation (Box 1, D), and the patient was discharged in December 2007. At that time, the surface area affected by the lesion was reduced by 55%.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful treatment of Buruli ulcer using fully oral treament with rifampicin and clarithromycin alone. We hope our experience will contribute to future discussion and studies to find an oral treatment for this devastating disease.
1 Serial views of Buruli ulcer in a woman treated with rifampicin and clarithromycin
Acknowledgements: Fondation Luxembourgeoise Raoul Follereau, Luxembourg; Projet Burulico European Union (project reference number, INCO-CT-2005-051476); and the World Health Organization, Geneva.
1 Centre de Dépistage et de Traitemente de l’Ulcère, Allada, Benin.
2 Programme National de Lutte contre la Lépre et l’Ulcère de Buruli, Cotonou, Benin.
3 Centre de Dépistage et de Traitemente de l’Ulcère, Lalo, Benin.
4 Laboratoire de Référence des Mycobactéries, Cotonou, Benin.
5 Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, Cotonou, Benin.
6 Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
7 Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
cdtuballadaATyahoo.fr
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377