eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Letters

A shift in the use of drug-eluting stents in Australian private hospitals

Suzanne M McLean and David J Clark
MJA 2008; 188 (2): 127

To the Editor: Drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) were approved for use in Australia in 2002, after they were found to be effective in limiting the incidence of restenosis.1 However, their cost is three to four times that of traditional bare-metal stents, and most Australian states restricted their use in the public health system. In 2006, we reported in the Journal that DES were used in 45% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Victorian public hospitals, and that they were largely reserved for patients with risk factors for restenosis, such as diabetes, small vessels, and complex lesions.2 However, in the private health system, DES can be claimed as prostheses from insurance funds, so their use is not limited by financial constraints.

In early 2007, multiple reports from around the world noted a small but significant increase in late stent thrombosis occurring 1–4 years after implantation of DES.3,4 This caused concern, as stent thrombosis has a mortality rate approaching 50%. It is now recommended that all patients with DES maintain aspirin and clopidogrel therapy for at least a year, although the appropriate duration of this treatment remains unknown.5 Further, long-term dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and is problematic for patients requiring surgery.4,5

We examined the use of DES from February 2006 to June 2007 in 674 patients undergoing PCI by 10 operators in a Victorian private hospital. Monthly use dropped dramatically, from a peak of 91% of patients in July 2006 to 34% in June 2007 (Box). In 118 PCIs performed between March and May 2007, DES were used more often in: diabetic than non-diabetic patients (67% v 47%; P = 0.05); small (≤ 2.5 mm) vessels compared with large vessels (74% v 53%; P = 0.04); and long lesions (> 20 mm stent length) compared with shorter lesions (62% v 52%; P = not significant). This mirrors the pattern previously seen only in patients treated in the public health system.2

Given the issue of late stent thrombosis and the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, reserving DES for patients who are at high risk of restenosis in both the public and private health systems seems very appropriate. Utilisation is likely to change again with a better understanding of the long-term safety of DES, but a cautious approach should be maintained.

Drug-eluting stent (DES) use per month (February 2006 – June 2007) in patients in a Victorian private hospital

Suzanne M McLean, Case ManagerDavid J Clark, Interventional Cardiologist

Department of Cardiology, Warringal Private Hospital, Melbourne, VIC.

clarkdavidjAThotmail.com

  1. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al; SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with a stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1315-1323. <PubMed>
  2. Yan BP, Ajani AE, Duffy SJ, et al; MIG Investigators. Use of drug-eluting stents in Victorian public hospitals. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 363-367. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  3. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 998-1008. <PubMed>
  4. Harper RW. Drug-eluting coronary stents — a note of caution. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 253-255. <eMJA full text> <PubMed>
  5. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr, et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 734-739. <PubMed>

(Received 4 Oct 2007, accepted 11 Oct 2007)

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377