To the Editor: In a recent article, de Costa and Robson1 suggest that Australia’s high rates of caesarean surgery — currently among the highest in the Western world — may be beneficial, and causally related to our low perinatal mortality rate.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Anstead, QLD.
Correspondence: sarahjbuckley@uqconnect.net
- 1. de Costa CM, Robson S. Throwing out the baby with the spa water? Med J Aust 2004; 181: 438-440. <MJA full text>
- 2. Matthews TG, Crowley P, Chong A, et al. Rising caesarean section rates: a cause for concern? BJOG 2003; 110: 346-349.
- 3. O’Driscoll K, Foley M. Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 1-5.
- 4. Sepkowitz S. Birth weight-specific fetal deaths and neonatal mortality and the rising cesarean section rate. J Okla State Med Assoc 1992; 85: 236-241.
- 5. Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003; 362: 1779-1784.
- 6. King JF, Slaytor EK, Sullivan EA. Maternal deaths in Australia, 1997–1999. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 413-414. <MJA full text>
- 7. Enkin M, Keirse MJNK, Neilson J, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000: 486.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.