Behavioural sciences can make a substantive contribution
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1 Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
- 2 Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- 3 Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Correspondence:
- 1. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care 2001; 39(8 Suppl 2): II46-II54.
- 2. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 1998; 76: 517-563, 509.
- 3. Sanson-Fisher R. Diffusion of innovation theory for clinical change. Med J Aust 2004; 180(6 Suppl). In press.
- 4. Grimshaw J, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004. In press.
- 5. Grol R. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ 1997; 315: 418-421.
- 6. National Institute of Clinical Studies workshop. Development of strategies to encourage adoption of best evidence into practice. Med J Aust 2004; 180(6 Suppl). In press.
- 7. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
- 8. Engel CE, Vysohlid J, Vodoratski VA. Continuing education for change. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Publications, European Series No 28, 1990.
- 9. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Social cognition models and health behaviour: a structured review. Psychology and Health 2000; 15: 173-189.
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.