In reply: We support Hill in his call for improving the dissemination of information and data about foreskin development and management. Circumcision is a highly emotive issue.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
Correspondence:
- 1. Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Wisniewski ZS, Holman DJC. Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 155-158. <eMJA full text>
- 2. Rickwood AMK, Kenny SE, Donnell SC. Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice. BMJ 2000; 321: 792-793.
- 3. Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. BMJ 1949; 2: 1433-1437.
- 4. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians Policy Statement on Circumcision, 2002. Paediatric and Health Division. Available at: http://www.racp.edu.au/hpu/paed/circumcision/print.htm (accessed May 2003).
- 5. Shankar KR, Rickwood AMK The incidence of phimosis in boys. BJU Int 1999; 84: 101-102.
- 6. Dewan PA. Treating phimosis. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 148-149. <eMJA full text>
- 7. Hugh TB, Hugh TJ. Appendicectomy — becoming a rare event. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 7-8. <eMJA full text>
- 8. Donnelly NJ, Semmens JB, Fletcher DR, Holman CDJ. Appendicectomy in Western Australia: profile and trends 1981–1997. Med J Aust 2001; 175; 15-18.<eMJA full text>
- 9. Darby R. Medical history and medical practice: persistent myths about the foreskin. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 178-179. <eMJA full text>
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.