eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Letters

In reply: Is asthma prevention possible with dietary manipulation?

Craig M Mellis
MJA 2003 178 (6): 303-304

In reply: Sherriff is correct in pointing out that the studies showing protection from bronchial asthma (and bronchial hyperresponsiveness) are based on consumption of fish meals rather than a direct measure of omega-3 fatty acid intake. This protection has been observed consistently in cross-sectional studies of New South Wales primary school children. Thus, the level of evidence is at best Level III, albeit using a proxy for omega-3 fatty acid intake.

Results of a randomised-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation currently under way in western Sydney are now in the public arena at 18-month follow-up.1,2 At this early stage, it is uncertain who has genuine asthma rather than other wheezing syndromes. Nevertheless, the group who received omega-3 fatty acid supplementation have differences in rates of wheeze compared with those not supplemented.1,2 For example, the rate of "ever" having had wheeze was 52.6% in the controls versus 42.8% in the supplemented group (absolute risk reduction, 9.8%; number need to treat, about 10).

In the table of recommendations in my article,3 I carefully pointed out that supplementing infants with omega-3 fatty acid is something to "consider" rather than strongly recommending it. It should also be noted the level of evidence is low (Level III). Stronger recommendations will depend on the long-term results of randomised trials, such as the western Sydney trial.1,2 In summary, at this stage the only strong dietary recommendations which can be made are:

The evidence for lactobacillus is Level II (from a single randomised controlled trial), although the protection shown is for atopy rather than asthma. Clearly, the children in the lactobacillus study will need further follow-up, and the trial will need to be repeated in other populations.

All of this highlights the need for better-quality studies in the area of primary prevention of asthma, based on dietary factors during pregnancy or early infancy.

  1. Mihrshahi S, Peat JK, Marks GB, et al. Effect of house dust mite reduction and dietary Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation from birth on atopy and wheeze in 18 month old children. Available at: http://www.thoracic.org.au/p35.pdf (accessed February 2003).
  2. Mihrshahi S, Peat JK, Marks GB et al. Eighteen-month outcomes of house dust mite avoidance and dietary fatty acid modification in the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS). J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003; 111: 162-168. <PubMed>
  3. Mellis CM. Is asthma prevention possible with dietary manipulation? Med J Aust 2002; 177 (16 Sep Suppl): S78-S80. <PubMed><eMJA full text>

(Received 17 Jan 2003, accepted 23 Jan 2003)

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW.

Craig M Mellis, MB BS, MD, MPH, FRACP, Head.

Correspondence: Professor Craig M Mellis, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW 2145. craigmATchw.edu.au

AntiSpam note: To avoid spam, authors' email addresses are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address.

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au Print ISSN: 0025-729X Online ISSN: 1326-5377

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA