Connect
MJA
MJA

Itching bites may limit Ross River virus infection

Peter A Ryan, Jillann F Farmer, Brian H Kay and Andreas Suhrbier
Med J Aust 2003; 178 (3): .
Published online: 3 February 2003

To the Editor: Dugdale recently suggested that people who develop skin reactions to mosquito bites may be protected against Ross River virus (RRV) disease.1 He noted that seven patients with a history of RRV disease all reported no skin reaction to mosquito bites, and 18 patients with no past history of RRV disease reported reacting to such bites. We argue that this correlation is entirely to be expected, as the lack of reaction to mosquito bites illustrates that the individuals have been previously exposed to many bites. At least two studies have shown a clear inverse correlation between mosquito exposure and bite reactions.2,3 Clearly, exposure to a large number of mosquito bites increases the risk of infection.4 Thus, a reaction to mosquito bites probably does not protect against RRV disease, but is simply a marker for low exposure to mosquito bites and therefore low risk of RRV infection.




Correspondence: 

  • 1. Dugdale AE. Itching bites may limit Ross River virus infection. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 399-400. <eMJA full text>
  • 2. Mellanby K. Man's reaction to mosquito bites. Nature 1946; 158: 554.
  • 3. Peng Z, Yang M, Estelle F, et al. Immunologic mechanisms in mosquito allergy: correlation of skin reactions with specific IgE and IgG antibodies and lymphocyte proliferation response to mosquito antigens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1996; 77: 238-244.
  • 4. Ryan PA, Do KA, Kay BH. Spatial and temporal analysis of Ross River virus disease patterns at Maroochy Shire, Australia: association between human morbidity and mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) abundance. J Med Entomol 1999; 36: 515-521.
  • 5. Phillips DA, Murray JR, Aaskov JG, Wiemers MA. Clinical and subclinical Barmah Forest virus infection in Queensland. Med J Aust 1990; 152: 463-466.
  • 6. Harley D, Sleigh A, Ritchie S. Ross River virus transmission, infection, and disease: a cross-disciplinary review. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14: 909-932.

Author

remove_circle_outline Delete Author
add_circle_outline Add Author

Comment
Do you have any competing interests to declare? *

I/we agree to assign copyright to the Medical Journal of Australia and agree to the Conditions of publication *
I/we agree to the Terms of use of the Medical Journal of Australia *
Email me when people comment on this article

Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.