Simple statements of risks and benefits may not reveal the complexity of human responses to research participation
In this issue of the Journal, Scott and colleagues (page 507) report on a retrospective study of family members' experience of participation in a previous study following their child's diagnosis with Ewing's sarcoma.1 The research is important because it casts empirical light on an ethical issue often debated in human research ethics committee meetings: how does research affect those who participate in it? Ethics committees can be very cautious about granting approval for research into sensitive areas because of concern about the impact on research participants.
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
- 1. Scott DA, Valery PC, Boyle FM, Bain CJ. Does research into sensitive areas do harm? Experiences of research participation after a child's diagnosis with Ewing's sarcoma. Med J Aust 2002; 177: 507-510. <eMJA full text>
- 2. McCarthy AM, Richman LC, Hoffman RP, Rubenstein L. Psychological screening of children for participation in nontherapeutic invasive research. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155: 1197-1203.
- 3. Fry C, Dwyer R. For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction 2001; 96: 1319-1325.
- 4. Roberts LW, Warner TD, Brody JL. Perspectives of patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists regarding ethically important aspects of research participation. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157: 67-74.
- 5. National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1999.
- 6. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 319-327.
- 7. Schmidtz D. Reasons for altruism. In: Frankel PE, Miller FD, Paul J, editors. Altruism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993: 52-68.
- 8. Van Der Steen WJ. Egoism and altruism in ethics: dispensing with spurious generality. Journal of Value Inquiry 1995; 29: 31-44.
- 9. National Health and Medical Research Council. Human research ethics handbook. Commentary on the national statement on ethical conduct in research involving humans. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2002.
- 10. McNeill PM. The ethics and politics of human experimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.