|
Olympic Games
Drug testing at the Sydney Olympics
With pre-Olympic and out-of-competition testing, as well as a new,
validated test for erythropoietin, athletes will be exposed to more
comprehensive drug testing at the Sydney Olympics
Brian Corrigan and Ray Kazlauskas
MJA 2000; 173: 312-313
See also, Kennedy
Drug screening -
Sample collection -
Analysis -
Conclusion -
References -
Authors' Details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Sports medicine
| |
Testing for drugs used to enhance performance has been carried out at
the Olympic Games since they were held in Mexico in 1968, when
Australia's Ron Clarke became the first athlete to be tested. Doping
at the Olympic Games is banned for two very good reasons: the use of
drugs is cheating, and drugs have adverse effects on the health of
athletes.1 The International Olympic
Committee (IOC) has maintained a list of proscribed substances and
methods for their detection since 1967, and this list is updated each
year to form the basis for determining banned substances in all
sport.2
In much the same way as random breath testing is used to deter drink
driving, drug testing is intended as a deterrent rather than a method
of catching all offenders. Thus, in Olympic final events, the
competitors who gain the first four places, plus one other usually
chosen at random, are subjected to a drug test. During Olympic heats,
any athlete may be selected at random for testing.
In past Olympic Games, athletes were not tested for drugs until after
they had competed in their events. At the Sydney Olympics, for the
first time, many athletes will be subject to pre-Olympic,
out-of-competition testing, as it is during this period that some
drugs, such as anabolic steroids, may be best detected. This
represents a huge change in the IOC position and has occurred after
much lobbying by, among others, the Drug Committee of the Sydney
Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (SOCOG).
|
Drug screening | |
Although blood testing has been performed in a limited fashion at
Winter Olympics since 1994, screening for drugs at the Summer Games
has, until these Sydney Games, been restricted to urine testing.
Urine samples are generally preferable to blood samples for testing
for most substances banned by the IOC, as it is easier to collect
adequate volumes of urine, and collection of urine is not so invasive.
Also, drug and metabolite levels are much higher in urine than in
blood, so their detection has greater retrospectivity.3 However, there
is a subset of drugs -- the peptide hormones such as erythropoietin
(EPO) and human growth hormone (hGH) -- for which establishing a
reliable urine test has proved a major obstacle. However, a validated
test for EPO has just been accepted by the IOC and will be available for
use at the Sydney Games. It involves both a blood test perfected by
Australian scientists, and a urine test perfected by the French.
|
Sample collection | |
The procedures of urine collection for doping control are rigorously
controlled.1 First, a chaperon meets the
chosen athlete at the conclusion of the event, provides
documentation of his or her selection, and obtains the athlete's
signature for verification. The chaperoned athlete attends the
doping control station, where forms are filled in to document all
prescribed, complementary and other medicines he or she may be
taking. The athlete selects his or her own container and provides a
urine sample under the observation of the chaperon, and possibly a
team representative.
Athletes are required to provide a specimen of approximately 75 mL.
This can take some time if the athlete is dehydrated, and athletes are
permitted to attend press conferences or receive medals in the
interim, provided they are always accompanied by their chaperons.
Fluids (not containing caffeine) are provided in the waiting room.
The urine sample is checked for volume, pH, and specific gravity (SG).
A low SG (< 1.010) could indicate an attempt to dilute the urine by
taking a diuretic or drinking litres of water. Athletes may have taken
sodium bicarbonate to prevent the build-up of lactic acid and so delay
the onset of fatigue. While it is difficult to detect sodium
bicarbonate, its use markedly elevates the pH (normally about p H 5-6
post-exercise).4 Also, at high pH, basic drugs
such as the amphetamines are very poorly excreted,5 so, if a urine
sample is dilute or has a high pH, the athlete will be asked to remain in
the collection area and to produce further samples.
Athletes divide their own 75 mL urine specimens into two aliquots in
bottles labelled A and B, which have the same unique identifying
number. These are secured for shipment to the laboratory. There are at
least three copies of the associated paperwork -- one for the athlete,
one for the testing authority (the IOC) and a third, abbreviated
version (that does not identify the athlete) for the laboratory. The
athlete verifies that the process was satisfactory.
The information recorded at the doping control station initiates a
chain of custody, which identifies the custodian of the sample at
every stage. This extends from urine collection through storage,
transport, delivery to the drug-testing laboratory, testing and
then the final report sent to the appropriate authority.
Correct storage of the urine sample is important and refrigeration is
essential to inhibit bacterial growth and endogenous steroids,
which can be modified under some conditions to produce, or, more
usually, break down, testosterone.6
|
|
|
Analysis |
State-of-the-art technology and quality control are integral to the
whole analytical procedure. The 27 laboratories around the world
currently accredited by the IOC are subjected to rigorous
reaccreditation testing each year.7 The IOC-accredited
laboratory in Sydney has been accredited since 1990 and performs
about 4000 tests within Olympic sports each year as part of the
Australian program to eliminate doping in sport (Australian Sports
Drug Agency, annual report, 1998). Medical practitioners cannot
request testing for competing athletes outside this system unless
the athletes have bona fide medical conditions and proper
documentation is supplied. During the two weeks of the Sydney Olympic
Games, up to 2000 samples will be analysed (some 10 000 individual drug
tests).
Samples are screened for banned substances by means of sophisticated
instruments such as gas chromatography mass spectrometers. Such
instruments can provide unambiguous identification of drugs or
metabolites to confirm a positive result. To obtain higher
sensitivity for anabolic steroids, and hence longer detection
periods of banned substances that may have been used during training
but not at event time, the IOC has introduced the use of
high-resolution mass spectrometry. This technique can detect
smaller quantities and was made compulsory by the IOC for the Atlanta
Olympics. The techniques have been refined and extended and will play
an integral part of the testing protocol at the Sydney Olympics.
The most common method of detecting exogenous testosterone, rather
than natural testosterone, is the testosterone/epitestosterone
(T/E) ratio.8 Epitestosterone is
normally secreted as an epimer of testosterone, and testosterone is
not converted to epitestosterone, so the population mean for the T/E
ratio is approximately one.9 An elevated T/E ratio
remains an excellent indicator of exogenous testosterone
abuse,10 and the IOC has determined
that values above six indicate doping. However, a very small group of
individuals have a naturally elevated T/E ratio. An
endocrinological investigation must be performed to detect
individuals with an elevated T/E ratio due to either a medical
condition or low normal epitestosterone production.9 More recently
carbon isotope ratio mass spectrometry has been used11 and this
technique may also assist in deciding these cases.
All testing is carried out on one of the duplicate samples from each
athlete (the A sample). The presence of a banned substance or its
metabolites is sufficient to constitute a positive test -- it is not
the responsibility of the testing authorities to determine how that
substance got into the body. However, positive results are further
investigated by the IOC Medical Commission. This may require
analysis of the second (B) sample, during which the athlete or his or
her representative may be present.1 If this analysis supports
the initial result, a hearing is held to determine if a doping offence
has occurred. The IOC Code clearly specifies the penalties that apply
for doping offences.
|
|
|
Conclusion |
Use of performance-enhancing drugs demeans both sport and the
athletes who use them. Now that sport is a multi-billion dollar
business, antidoping programs must be correctly undertaken so as not
to allow evasion by the use of legal arguments and loopholes. This
requires constant research into doping practices and programs. It
goes without saying that the whole drug-testing process has to be,
like Caesar's wife, beyond suspicion.
|
|
|
References |
- Olympic Movement Anti-Doping Code. Lausanne, Switzerland:
International Olympic Committee, 1999.
-
Kicman AT, Cowan DA. Peptide hormones and sport: misuse and
detection. Br Med Bull 1992; 48: 496-517.
-
Donike M, Geyer H, Gotzmann A, et al. Blood analysis in doping
control. Advantages and disadvantages. In: Hemmersbach P,
Birkeland K, editors. Proceedings of the Second International
Symposium on Drugs in Sports. Towards the use of blood samples in
doping control? Lillehammer, Norway, 1993. Oslo, Norway: On Demand
Publishing, 1994: 75-92.
-
Tiryaki GR, Atterbom HA. The effects of sodium bicarbonate and
sodium citrate on 600m running time of trained females. J Sports
Med Physical Fitness 1995; 35: 194-198.
-
Mottram DR. Drugs in sport. 2nd ed. London: Spon, 1996: 8-9.
-
Ayotte C. Evaluation of elevated testosterone epitestosterone
values in athlete's urine samples. IAAF Quarterly 1997; 2:
87-94.
-
Doping. An IOC white paper. Lausanne, Switzerland: International
Olympic Committee, 1999.
-
Anguilera R, Becchi M, Casabianca H, et al. Improved method of
detection of testosterone abuse by gas chromatography combustion
isotope ratio mass spectrometry analysis of urinary steroids. J
Mass Spectrom 1996; 31: 169-176.
-
Dehennin L, Matsumoto AM. Long-term administration of
testosterone enanthate to normal men: alteration of the urinary
profile of androgen metabolites potentially useful for detection of
testosterone misuse in sport. J Steroid Biochem Biol 1993;
44: 179-189.
-
Catlin DH, Hatton CK, Starcevic SH. Issues in detecting abuse of
xenobiotic anabolic steroids and testosterone by analysis of
athletes' urine. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 1280-1288.
-
Becchi M, Anguilera R, Farizon Y, et al. Gas
chromatography/combustion/isotope-ratio mass spectrometry
analysis of urinary steroids to detect misuse of testosterone in
sport. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 1994; 8: 304-308.
|
Authors' Details | |
Institute of sport, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Brian Corrigan, AM, FRACP, FRCP, Director.
Australian Sports Drug Testing Laboratory, Pymble, NSW.
Ray Kazlauskas, PhD, Director.
Reprints will not be available from the authors.
Correspondence: Dr B Corrigan, 1 Lookout Avenue, Dee Why, NSW 2009.
abcATsouthernx.com.au
©MJA 2000
Make a
comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|