Integrated electronic health records and patient privacy: possible benefits but real dangers

---

• 1.
• Laires M, Ladeira M, Christensen J, editors. Health in the new communications age. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1995.
• 2.
• House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs. Health on line. Report into health information management and telemedicine. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1997. Available at <http://www. aph.gov.au/house/committee/fca/tmreport.pdf>.
• 3.
• The Caldicott Committee. Report on the review of patient-identifiable information -- December 1997. London: NHS Executive, 1997. Available at <http://www. doh.gov.uk/confiden/crep.htm>.
• 4.
• Smith PF. Privacy, confidentiality and safety of healthcare information systems: better information is needed. Health Informatics J 1998; 4: 124-127.
• 5.
• National Health Service Executive. Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005. NHS, 1998.
• 6.
• Stevens R. Medical record databases. Just what you need? Report prepared for the Privacy Commissioner. New Zealand. April 1998. <http://www.privacy.org.nz/ people/mrdrep.html>. Accessed 11 November 1999.
• 7.
• Privacy Commissioner of Canada. 1997-98 Annual Report. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 1998. Available at <http://www. privcom.gc.ca/02_04_06_e.htm>.
• 8.
• Roberts M, Stokes J. Prescriptions, practitioners and pharmacists. Med J Aust 1998; 168: 317-318.
• 9.
• Nygren E, Wyatt J, Wright P. Medical records: helping clinicians to find data and avoid delays. Lancet 1998; 352: 1462-1466.
• 10.
• Powsner S, Wyatt J, Wright P. Medical records: opportunities for and challenges of computerisation. Lancet 1998; 352: 1617-1622.
• 11.
• National Pharmacy Intranet Demonstration Project. Getting connected. Discussion paper. September 1998.
• 12.
• Anderson RJ. Safety and privacy in clinical systems: the state of play. Health Informatics J 1998; 4: 121-123.
• 13.
• Anthony D, Mandeville T, Hearn G, Holman L. Demand for broadband services in the health sector. Brisbane: Communication Centre Queensland University of Technology, 1994.
• 14.
• Centralised data system worries. News from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner 1998: 29.
• 15.
• Harding E. Privacy impact assessment and commentary on the health intranet project for New Zealand Health Information Service. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 1996; finding 6.
• 16.
• Wahlberg D. Patient records on Web 2 months. The Ann Arbor News 1999; February 11. <http://aa.mlive.com/news/index.ssf?/news/stories/records2.frm>. Accessed 11 November 1999.
• 17.
• New South Wales Independent Commission Against Corruption. Report of inquiry into unauthorised release of government information. Sydney: ICAC, 1992.
• 18.
• House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (the Melham Committee). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 1995.
• 19.
• Walsh G. Review of policy relating to encryption technologies (the Walsh Report). <http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Crypto/Walsh/walsh.htm>. Accessed 11 November 1999.
• 20.
• The Ishtar Guidelines for healthcare security. Health Informatics J 1998; 4: 179-180.
• 21.
• Aiken J. Proposed bills would restrict access to medical records. CNN Interactive. 1999; April 27.<http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/04/27/medical.records/>. Accessed 11 November 1999.
• 22.
• Carter M, et al. The information society in general practice: consumer perspectives: a report to the Department of Health and Aged Care General Practice Evaluation Program. Melbourne: Health Issues Centre, 1998.
• 23.
• Debating health information technology [letter]. Health Affairs 1999; 18: 255.
• 24.
• Detmer D, Deering M. Health information: a broader view. Health Affairs 1999; 18: 256-257.
• 25.
• Advisory Council on Health Infostructure. Canada Health Infoway: Pathways to better health. Final report. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 1999. Available at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ohih-bsi/achis/fin-rpt_e.html>.