Sex selection: the case for

---

• 1.
• Fugger EF, Black SH, Keyvanfar K, Schulman JD. Births of normal daughters after Microsort sperm separation and intrauterine insemination, in-vitro fertilization, or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2367-2370.
• 2.
• Carter H. Couple buy a baby girl to order. Herald Sun (Melbourne) 1998; Sept 12: 9.
• 3.
• Carter H. Pick-the-sex test. Herald Sun (Melbourne) 1999; May 5: 5.
• 4.
• Carter H. Baby sex selection method draws fire. Herald Sun (Melbourne) 1999; Jan 29: 4.
• 5.
• Carson SA. Sex selection: the ultimate in family planning. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 16-19.
• 6.
• R v Davidson [1969] VR 667, Menhennitt J.
• 7.
• Jansen RPS. Evidence based ethics and the regulation of reproduction. Hum Reprod 1998; 9: 2068-2075.
• 8.
• Benagiano G, Bianchi P. Sex preselection: an aid to couples or a threat to humanity? Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 868-870.
• 9.
• te Velde ER, van Baar AL, van Kooij RJ. Concerns about assisted reproduction. Lancet 1998; 351: 1529-1534.
• 10.
• Bowen JR, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, Saunders DM. Medical and developmental outcome at 1 year for children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet 1998; 351: 1529-1534.
• 11.
• Dulioust E, Toyama K, Busnel MC, et al. Long-term effects of embryo freezing in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 589-593.
• 12.
• Wennerholm UB, Albertsson WK, Bergh C, et al. Postnatal growth and health in children born after cryopreservation as embryos. Lancet 1998; 351: 1085-1090.
• 13.
• Simpson JL, Carson SA. The reproductive option of sex selection. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 870-872.
• 14.
• Harris J. "Goodbye Dolly?" The ethics of human cloning. J Med Ethics 1997; 23: 353-360.
• 15.
• Ralph I. Autism. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 97-104.
• 16.
• President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Screening and counselling for genetic conditions. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983; 58-59.
• 17.
• Wertz DC, Fletcher JC. Ethics and human genetics: a cross cultural perspective. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1989.
• 18.
• Zeng Y, Tu P, Gu BC, et al. Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratios at birth in China. Pop Dev Rev 1993; 19: 283-302.
• 19.
• Registrar General of India. Census of India 1991. Final population totals. Series I. India, Paper 2. New Delhi: Registrar General and Census Commissioner, 1992.
• 20.
• Sen A. More than 100 million women are missing. New York Review of Books 1990; Dec 20; 61.
• 21.
• Young R. The ethics of selecting for fetal sex. Ballieres Clin Obstet and Gynaecol 1991; 5: 576-590.
• 22.
• Singer P, Wells D. The reproduction revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984; 171.
• 23.
• Sureau G. Gender selection: a crime against humanity or the exercise of a fundamental right? Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 867-868.
• 24.
• Newell C. The social nature of disability, disease and genetics. J Med Ethics 1999; 25: 172-175.
• 25.
• Davis A. From where I sit. London: Triangle, 1989; 19.
• 26.
• Davis A. Yes, the baby should live. New Scientist 1985; Oct 31: 54.
• 27.
• Batzofin JH. XY sperm separation for sex selection. Urological Clinics of North America 1987; 14: 609-618.
• 28.
• Lui P, Rose GA. Social aspects of over 800 couples coming forward for gender selection of their children. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 968-971.